Examination of the Rev. Mr. Harris's scriptural researches on the licitness of the slave trade — John Shaqi
Examination of the Rev. Mr. Harris's scriptural researches on the licitness of the slave tradeRamsay, James
Religion
Examination of the Rev. Mr. Harris's scriptural researches on the licitness of the slave trade
Ramsay, James
Harris, R. (Raymund). Scriptural researches on the licitness of the slave trade; Slave trade -- Early works to 1800
TRANSCRIBER’S NOTE
Italic text is denoted by _underscores_.
The original text used the character ſ (long-form s); these have been
replaced by the normal s in this etext.
A few obvious typographical errors and punctuation errors have been
corrected after careful comparison with other occurrences within
the text and consultation of external sources.
All misspellings in the text, and inconsistent or archaic usage,
have been retained.
EXAMINATION
OF
The Rev. Mr. HARRIS’s
SCRIPTURAL RESEARCHES
ON
The Licitness of the Slave-Trade.
By the Rev. JAMES RAMSAY.
LONDON:
Printed by JAMES PHILLIPS, George-Yard,
Lombard-Street.
M.DCC.LXXXVIII.
ADVERTISEMENT.
The following Examination was drawn up in the country, from a casual
perusal of Mr. Harris’s Scriptural Researches, with a view of
putting them into the hands of any person, who might be employed in
answering that very extraordinary work. But on coming up to town,
and understanding that Mr. Harris’s reasoning had produced effects
on certain people, who had not studied the scriptures, or attended
to that spirit of freedom, which runs throughout the Old and New
Testament, and who hitherto had suffered themselves to be reluctantly
dragged along by the present prevailing enthusiasm in favour of
freedom, but now eagerly seized on a pretence for abandoning the
cause, it has been judged proper to give it at once to the publick.
Mr. Harris affects to proceed mathematically in the treatment of
his subject, and therefore establishes certain data. I had thought
it sufficient to contradict their particular application, in my
examination of the subject; but others thinking it necessary to take
more direct notice of them, I have subjoined the following short
observations.
Dat. 1, 2. “The scriptures of the Old and New Testament are of equal
authority, and contain the unerring decisions of the word of God.”
Observation. Certainly: but it will not be disputed, that there are
many things, not indeed deserving the name of decisions, but that
pass without censure, and are seemingly allowed there, which we know
to be forbidden to us, and which will not apply to the improved state
of mankind. Laws must be adapted, not only to the state of society,
but to the present state of the improvement of the human mind, which
we know has been gradually advancing from the earliest ages.
Dat. 3, 4. “It is criminal to refuse assent to what the scriptures
decide to be intrinsically good or bad.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account