Examination of the Rev. Mr. Harris's scriptural researches on the licitness of the slave trade — John Shaqi
Examination of the Rev. Mr. Harris's scriptural researches on the licitness of the slave tradeRamsay, James
Religion
Examination of the Rev. Mr. Harris's scriptural researches on the licitness of the slave trade
Ramsay, James
Harris, R. (Raymund). Scriptural researches on the licitness of the slave trade; Slave trade -- Early works to 1800
The land of Canaan was allotted to the Jews for an inheritance.
The former inhabitants, for their sins, were to be extirpated, or
expelled. The Gibeonites preferred slavery to this. Their services
were allotted first to the tabernacle, then to the temple. It appears
from David’s application to them, on account of the famine brought on
the land for Saul’s massacre of them, that they were kept distinct as
a people. We may suppose that they continued to occupy part of their
ancient possessions (for we find in David’s time that even Araunah
a Jebusite was a proprietor of land) and that they were in their
turn draughted off for the service of religion; those who occupied
the lands maintaining those who served. There is not one common
circumstance between the manner of their becoming servants, and the
present Leverpool slave trade, and hardly any more in their treatment.
Page 50. On the supposition of the iniquity of the (Leverpool) “slave
trade,” he speaks of the Almighty disturbing the course of nature,
when the sun stood still at Joshua’s command, to make it subservient
to injustice and oppression, in vindication of ill-gotten property.
Here he may be assured the horror of the expression will secure him
from contradiction.
Page 54. “The slave trade,” (still Leverpool slave trade) “is in
perfect harmony with the principles of the word of God respecting
justice.” P. 58. “The inspired writers of the New Testament did not
consider it as an infraction of the principles of the gospel.” Nor
did these declare their own persecution for righteousness sake, to be
an infraction of the principles of the gospel. The keeping of slaves,
which the author constantly calls “the slave trade,” was a custom
then generally prevalent over the world. Neither were masters or
slaves prepared for a general manumission. The spirit of Christianity
was suffered gradually to undermine this mass of oppression, and
wherever the gospel has prevailed, it has in fact abolished it.
We have a similar instance of this management, in the abolition
of the ceremonial law of Moses. The first disciples, and even the
apostles, conformed to it, though they had declared it to be an
unnecessary yoke, and they suffered it to wear out gradually. That
slavery was an evil, and therefore a sin in all those who inflicted
it on others, in such a degree as to become an evil, is plainly
declared in the gospel. Our Saviour tells the believing Jews, If ye
continue in my word, ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall
make you free; or shall confer new privileges on you. If freedom
be a privilege or an advantage, slavery is a degradation and a
disadvantage. But if a man be degraded or injured for the caprice or
profit of another, that other, under whom he suffers such injury, is
guilty of a sin.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account