I think it was Dr. Chalmers who said, criticising Coleridge, that for
his part he wanted ideas which he could see all round, and not such as
he must look at away up in the heavens. Such a man, one would say,
would never look at the moon, because she never turns her other side to
us. The light which comes from ideas which have their orbit as distant
from the earth, and which is no less cheering and enlightening to the
benighted traveller than that of the moon and stars, is naturally
reproached or nicknamed as moonshine by such. They are moonshine, are
they? Well, then do your night-travelling when there is no moon to
light you; but I will be thankful for the light that reaches me from
the star of least magnitude. Stars are lesser or greater only as they
appear to us so. I will be thankful that I see so much as one side of a
celestial idea,—one side of the rainbow,—and the sunset sky.
Men talk glibly enough about moonshine, as if they knew its qualities
very well, and despised them; as owls might talk of sunshine. None of
your sunshine,—but this word commonly means merely something which they
do not understand,—which they are abed and asleep to, however much it
may be worth their while to be up and awake to it.
It must be allowed that the light of the moon, sufficient though it is
for the pensive walker, and not disproportionate to the inner light we
have, is very inferior in quality and intensity to that of the sun. But
the moon is not to be judged alone by the quantity of light she sends
to us, but also by her influence on the earth and its inhabitants. “The
moon gravitates toward the earth, and the earth reciprocally toward the
moon.” The poet who walks by moonlight is conscious of a tide in his
thought which is to be referred to lunar influence. I will endeavor to
separate the tide in my thoughts from the current distractions of the
day. I would warn my hearers that they must not try my thoughts by a
daylight standard, but endeavor to realize that I speak out of the
night. All depends on your point of view. In Drake’s “Collection of
Voyages,” Wafer says of some Albinoes among the Indians of Darien,
“They are quite white, but their whiteness is like that of a horse,
quite different from the fair or pale European, as they have not the
least tincture of a blush or sanguine complexion. * * * Their eyebrows
are milk-white, as is likewise the hair of their heads, which is very
fine. * * * They seldom go abroad in the daytime, the sun being
disagreeable to them, and causing their eyes, which are weak and
poring, to water, especially if it shines towards them, yet they see
very well by moonlight, from which we call them moon-eyed.”
Neither in our thoughts in these moonlight walks, methinks, is there
“the least tincture of a blush or sanguine complexion,” but we are
intellectually and morally Albinoes,—children of Endymion,—such is the
effect of conversing much with the moon.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account