Experimental Determination of the Velocity of Light: Made at the U.S. Naval Academy, AnnapolisMichelson, Albert A. (Albert Abraham)
Science
Experimental Determination of the Velocity of Light: Made at the U.S. Naval Academy, Annapolis
Michelson, Albert A. (Albert Abraham)
Light -- Speed
The greatest error, excluding the one just mentioned, would probably be
less than .00009 in the measurement of φ.
Summing up the various errors, we find, then, that the total constant
error, in the most unfavorable case, where the errors are all in the same
direction, would be .00015. Adding to this the probable error of the
result, .00002, we have for the limiting value of the error of the final
result ±.00017. This corresponds to an error of ±51 kilometers.
The correction for the velocity of light in vacuo is found by multiplying
the speed in air by the index of refraction of air, at the temperature of
the experiments. The error due to neglecting the barometric height is
exceedingly small. This correction, in kilometers, is +80.
Final Result.
The mean value of V from the tables is 299852
Correction for temperature +12
------------
Velocity of light in air 299864
Correction for vacuo 80
------------
Velocity of light in vacuo 299944±51
The final value of the velocity of light from these experiments is
then--299940 kilometers per second, or 186380 miles per second.
Objections Considered.
Measurement of the Deflection.
The chief objection, namely, that in the method of the revolving mirror
the deflection is small, has already been sufficiently answered. The same
objection, in another form, is that the image is more or less indistinct.
This is answered by a glance at the tables. These show that in each
individual observation the average error was only three ten-thousandths of
the whole deflection.
Uncertainty of Laws of Reflection and Refraction in Media in Rapid
Rotation.
What is probably hinted at under the above heading is that there may be a
possibility that the rapid rotation of the mirror throws the reflected
pencil in the direction of rotation. Granting that this is the case, an
inspection of Fig. 14 shows that the deflection will not be affected.
In this figure let _m m_ be the position of the mirror when the light
first falls on it from the slit at _a_, and _m′ m′_ the position when the
light returns.
[Illustration: FIG. 14.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account