Experiments and Considerations Touching Colours (1664)Boyle, Robert
History
Experiments and Considerations Touching Colours (1664)
Boyle, Robert
Color -- Early works to 1800; Colors -- Early works to 1800
Secondly, But were it granted, as it is in some cases not Improbable, that
divers Bodies may receive a Blackness from a Sootie Exhalation, occasion'd
by the Adustion of their Sulphur, which (for the Reasons lately mention'd I
should rather call their Oyly parts;) yet still this account is applicable
but to some Particular Bodies, and will afford us no General Theory of
Blackness. For if, for example, White Harts-horn, being, in Vessels well
luted to each other, expos'd to the fire, be said to turn Black by the
Infection of its own Smoak, I think I may justly demand, what it is that
makes the Smoak or Soot it self Black, since no Such Colour, but its
contrary, appear'd before in the Harts-horn? And with the same Reason, when
we are told, that torrify'd Sulphur makes bodies Black, I desire to be told
also, why Torrefaction makes Sulphur it self Black? nor will there be any
Satisfactory Reason assign'd of these Quæries, without taking in those
Fertile as well as intelligible Mechanical Principles of the Position and
Texture of the Minute parts of the body in reference to the Light and the
Eye; and these applicable Principles may Serve the turn in many cases,
where the Adustion of Sulphur cannot be pretended; as in the appearing
Blackness of an Open window, lookt upon at a somewhat remote distance from
the house, as also in the Blackness Men think they see in the Holes that
happen to be in White linnen, or Paper of the like Colour; and in the
Increasing Blackness immediatly Produc'd barely by so rubbing Velvet, whose
Piles were Inclin'd before, as to reduce them to a more Erected posture, in
which and in many other cases formerly alleg'd, there appears nothing
requisite to the Production of _the_ Blackness, but the hindering of the
incident Beams of Light from rebounding plentifully enough to the Eye. To
be short, those I reason with, do concerning Blackness, what the Chymists
are wont also to do concerning other Qualities, namely to content
themselves to tell us, in what Ingredient of a Mixt Body, the Quality
enquir'd after, does reside, instead of explicating the Nature of it, which
(to borrow a comparison from their own Laboratories) is much as if in an
enquiry after the cause of Salivation, they should think it enough to tell
us, that the several Kinds of Præcipitates of Gold and _Mercury_) as
likewise of Quick-silver and Silver (for I know that make and use of such
Precipitates also) do Salivate upon the account of the _Mercury_, which
though Disguis'd abounds in them, whereas the Difficulty is as much to know
upon what account _Mercury_ it self, rather than other Bodies, has that
power of working by Salivation. Which I say not, as though it were not
_something_ (and too often the most we can arrive at) to discover in which
of the Ingredients of a Compounded Body, the Quality, whose Nature is
sought, resides, but because, though this Discovery it self may pass for
_something_, and is oftentimes more than what is taught us about the same
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account