"_Such were my reasons for concluding_ that the cerebrum and
cerebellum were parts distinct in function, and that every nerve
possessing a double function obtained that by having a double
root. _I now saw the meaning_ of the double connection of the
nerves with the spinal marrow; and also the cause of that
seeming intricacy in the connections of nerves throughout their
course, which were not double at their origins."
It is impossible to reconcile the 1830 sentences with this vivid
personal account of himself; _I had an opportunity of putting my
opinion to the test of experiment ... an opportunity of proving ...
Such were my reasons for concluding ... I now saw...._ It is just what
all men of science say of their experiments: the very phrase of
Archimedes, and Asellius, and de Graaf. If Sir Charles Bell had been
working at the facts of chemistry or of botany, who would have doubted
the meaning of these words?
This same inconsistency of sentences occurs elsewhere in his _Nervous
System of the Human Body_. In one place he says that he has made few
experiments: _They have been simple, and easily performed, and I hope
are decisive._ In another he says: "_After making several experiments
on the cerebrum and cerebellum, I laid the question of their functions
entirely aside_, and confined myself to the investigation of the
spinal marrow and the nerves; _a subject which I found more within my
power_, and which forms the substance of the present volume."
Next, take his account of the cranial nerves:--
"It was necessary to know, in the first place, whether the
phenomena exhibited on injuring the separate roots corresponded
with what was suggested by their anatomy....
"Here a difficulty arose. An opinion prevailed that ganglions
were intended to cut off sensation; and every one of these
nerves, which I supposed were the instruments of sensation, have
ganglions on their roots. Some very decided experiment was
necessary to overturn this dogma. (Account of the experiment.)
By pursuing the inquiry, it was found that a ganglionic nerve is
the sole organ of sensation in the head and face: ganglions were
therefore no hindrance to sensation; and thus my opinion was
confirmed.... _It now became obvious_ why the third, sixth, and
ninth nerves of the encephalon were single nerves in their
roots....
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account