"I remember that when I asked our famous Harvey, in the only
discourse I had with him, which was but a while before he died,
what were the things which induced him to think of the
circulation of the blood, he answered me that when he took
notice that the valves in the veins of so many parts of the body
were so placed that they gave free passage of the blood towards
the heart, but opposed the passage of the venal blood the
contrary way, he was invited to imagine that so provident a
cause as Nature had not so placed so many valves without design;
and no design seemed more probable than that, since the blood
could not well, because of the interposing valves, be sent by
the veins to the limbs, it should be sent by the arteries, and
return through the veins, whose valves did not oppose its course
that way."
But between this observation, which "invited him to imagine" a theory,
and his final proofs of the circulation, lay a host of difficulties;
and it is certain, from his own account of his work, that experiments
on animals were of the utmost help to him in leading him "out of the
labyrinth."
III.--AFTER HARVEY
1. _The Capillaries_
The capillary vessels were not known in Harvey's time: the
_capillamenta_ of Cæsalpinus were not the capillaries, but the
[Greek: neura] of Aristotle. It was believed that the blood, between
the smallest arteries and the smallest veins, made its way through
"blind porosities" in the tissues, as water percolates through earth
or through a sponge. The first account of the capillaries is in two
letters (_De Pulmonibus_, 1661) from Malpighi, professor of medicine
at Bologna, to Borelli, professor of mathematics at Pisa. In his first
letter, Malpighi writes that he has tried in vain, by injecting the
dead body, to discover how the blood passes from the arteries into the
veins:--
"This enigma hitherto distracts my mind, though for its solution
I have made many and many attempts, all in vain, with air and
various coloured fluids. Having injected ink with a syringe into
the pulmonary artery, I have again and again seen it escape
(become extravasated into the tissues) at several points. The
same thing happens with an injection of mercury. These
experiments do not give us the natural pathway of the blood."
But, in his second letter, he describes how he has examined, with a
microscope of two lenses, the lung and the mesentery of a frog, and
has seen the capillaries, and the blood in them:--
"Such is the divarication of these little vessels, coming off
from the vein and the artery, that the order in which the vessel
ramifies is no longer preserved, but it looks like a network
woven from the offshoots of both vessels."
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account