Expositor's Bible: The Gospel of MatthewGibson, John Monro
Religion
Expositor's Bible: The Gospel of Matthew
Gibson, John Monro
Bible. Matthew -- Criticism, interpretation, etc.
This was the first occasion on which our Lord distinctly put forth His
claim to royalty. From the beginning of His ministry He had shown
Himself to be a "prophet mighty in word and in deed," and to those who
followed Him it became manifest that He was the Prophet foretold by
Moses, for whose coming they had been taught to look with eager eyes
(see Deut. xviii. 15-19). From the beginning of His ministry, too, the
Saviour had been proclaiming "the gospel of the kingdom"; but when we
examine carefully all He says about it, we find that He never
expressly asserts that He Himself is King. Not that He conceals the
all-important truth: He speaks of the kingdom in such a way that those
who have ears to hear may learn that He is King Himself--as, for
instance, when He says, "Suffer the little children to come unto Me,
and forbid them not: for of such is the kingdom of heaven." One might
quite readily infer from these words that Jesus Himself was King; but
the claim is not thereby formally made. Besides, not only is it true
that up to this time He did not formally assume the royal title, but
He even resisted attempts made to thrust it upon Him (_e.g._, John vi.
15). For this refusal to be crowned by the multitude there was only
too good reason. Their ideas of royalty were entirely different from
His. Had He allowed Himself to be borne on the tide of popular favour
to royal honours, His kingdom would have been thereby marked as "of
this world," it would have been stamped as something very different
from the kingdom of "righteousness and peace and joy in the Holy
Ghost" He had come to establish. Had He been a mere enthusiast, He
would undoubtedly have yielded to such a tidal wave of public
excitement; but His unerring wisdom taught Him that He must reach His
throne by another path than that of popular favour. Rather must it be
through popular rejection--through the dark portals of despite and
death; and for that, His hour had not then come.
Now it has come. He has been steadily advancing to Jerusalem for the
very purpose of accomplishing that decease which is to be the portal
of His royalty. Already fully revealed as Prophet, He is about to be
made "perfect through suffering" as our great High Priest. It is time,
therefore, that He reveal Himself as King, so that no one may have it
afterwards to say that He never really claimed the throne of His
father David.
How, then, shall He assert His right? Shall a herald be sent to
proclaim with the sound of a trumpet that Jesus of Nazareth is King
over Israel in Jerusalem? To take such a course would be to court
misunderstanding. It would be to raise the standard of revolt against
the Romans. It would stir the city in a very different fashion from
that in which the Prince of Peace would have it stirred. It would be
the signal for tumult, bloodshed, and disastrous war. The ordinary
method is evidently not to be thought of. How, then, shall it be done?
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account