Expositor's Bible: The Gospel of MatthewGibson, John Monro
Religion
Expositor's Bible: The Gospel of Matthew
Gibson, John Monro
Bible. Matthew -- Criticism, interpretation, etc.
1. The first shall be one of those semi-political semi-religious
questions on which feeling is running high--the lawfulness or
unlawfulness of paying tribute to Cæsar. The old Pharisees who had
challenged His authority keep in the background, that the sinister
purpose of the question may not appear; but they are represented by
some of their disciples who, coming fresh upon the scene and
addressing Jesus in terms of respect and appreciation, may readily
pass for guileless inquirers. They are accompanied by some Herodians,
whose divergence of view on the point made it all the more natural
that they should join with Pharisees in asking the question; for it
might fairly be considered that they had been disputing with one
another in regard to it, and had concluded to submit the question to
His decision as to one who would be sure to know the truth and
fearless to tell it. So together they come with the request: "Master,
we know that Thou art true, and teachest the way of God in truth,
neither carest Thou for any man: for Thou regardest not the person of
men. Tell us therefore, What thinkest Thou? Is it lawful to give
tribute unto Cæsar, or not?"
But they cannot impose upon Him: "Jesus perceived their wickedness,
and said, Why tempt ye Me, ye hypocrites?" Having thus unmasked them,
without a moment's hesitation He answers them. They had expected a
"yes" or a "no"--a "yes" which would have set the people against Him,
or better still a "no" which would have put Him at the mercy of the
government. But, avoiding Scylla on the one hand, and Charybdis on the
other, He makes straight for His goal by asking for a piece of coin
and calling attention to Cæsar's stamp upon it. Those who use Cæsar's
coin should not refuse to pay Cæsar's tribute; but, while the relation
which with their own acquiescence they sustain to the Roman emperor
implied corresponding obligations in the sphere it covered, this did
not at all interfere with what is due to the King of kings and Lord of
lords, in Whose image we all are made, and Whose superscription every
one of us bears: "Render therefore unto Cæsar the things which are
Cæsar's; and unto God the things that are God's." Thus He not only
avoids the net they had spread for Him, and gives them the very best
answer to their question, but, in doing so, He lays down a great
principle of far-reaching application and permanent value respecting
the difficult and much-to-be-vexed question as to the relations
between Church and State. "O answer full of miracle!" as one has said.
No wonder that "when they had heard these words, they marvelled, and
left Him, and went their way."
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account