The observed values in general fall between those for the pure classes and those corresponding to random orientation. They are of the same order as the latter, and the discrepancies are perhaps not unaccountably large in view of the nature and the limited extent of the material. There is a systematic difference, however, averaging about 0.2 mag., in the sense that the observed values are too large, and increasing with decreasing ellipticity. One explanation is that the observed classes are purer than is expected on the assumption of random orientation. This view is supported by the relatively small dispersion in C, as may be seen in Table I and Figure 2, among the nebulae of a given class, but it is difficult to account for any such selective effect in the observations. The discrepancies may be largely eliminated by an arbitrary adjustment of the numbers of nebulae with various degrees of actual ellipticity; for instance, the values in the last column of Table XII, calculated on the assumption of equal numbers, agree very well with the observed values, although the resulting numbers having the various apparent ellipticities differ slightly from those observed. The observed values, however, can again be accounted for by the inclusion of some flatter nebulae among the classes E6 and E7. Very early Sa or SBa nebulae might easily be mistaken for E nebulae when oriented edge-on, although they would be readily recognized when even slightly tilted. If the numerical results fully represented actual statistical laws, the explanation would be sought in the physical nature of the nebulae. The change from ellipsoidal to lenticular figures, noticeable in the later-type nebulae, would affect the results in the proper direction, as would also a progressive shortening of the polar axis. The discrepancies, however, are second-order effects, and since they may be due to accidental variations from random orientation, a further discussion must await the accumulation of more data.