5866 | Sa | .48 | 11.76 | 11.51
7331 | Sb | +0.95 | 11.82 | 10.93
Means | | +0.509 | 11.60 | 11.90
-------+------------+---------+----------------+---------------
The low value for Sa-SBa is due to N.G.C. 5866, for which the
magnitude difference of 0.06 is certainly in error, and the high value
for Sc and SBc, to M 51, for which the difference of 3.98 mag. is not
representative. The latter is accounted for in part by the fact that
the m_{T} refers to the combined magnitude of the main spiral and
the outlying mass, N.G.C. 5195. When these two cases are discarded,
the final mean becomes 1.52 ± 0.05, and the average residual, 0.52
mag., is consistent with the probable errors of the magnitude
determinations. The small numbers of objects within each class are
insufficient for reliable conclusions concerning slight variations
along the sequence. From the constancy of m_{n} – m_{T}, the relation
expressed by formula (6) necessarily follows, the small difference in
the constant being accounted for by the different methods of handling
the data.
[Illustration: Fig. 9.—Relation between nuclear magnitudes and
diameters. The nebulae have been reduced to the standard type by
applying corrections to the magnitudes.]
The parallelism of the two curves representing formulae (2) and (6)
indicates that the regular extra-galactic nebulae, when reduced to the
standard type, are similar objects. The mean surface brightness is
constant, and the luminosity of the nucleus, as measured by Hopmann,
is a constant fraction, about one-fourth, of the total luminosity of
the nebulae. If there is a considerable range in absolute magnitude
and hence in actual dimensions, the smaller nebulae must be faithful
miniatures of the larger ones.
ABSOLUTE MAGNITUDES OF EXTRA-GALACTIC NEBULAE
Reliable values of distances, and hence of absolute magnitudes, are
restricted to a very few of the brightest nebulae. These are derived
from a study of individual stars involved in the nebulae, among which
certain types have been identified whose absolute magnitudes in the
galactic system are well known. The method assumes that the stars
involved in the nebulae are directly comparable with the stars in our
own system, and this is supported by the consistency of the results
derived from the several different types which have been identified.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account