Fénelon, François de Salignac de La Mothe-, 1651-1715
The chief doctrine that Fénelon set himself to defend is summarized by
Upham in the following three propositions: “First, the provisions of the
Gospel are such that men may gain the entire victory over their sinful
propensities, and may live in constant and accepted communion with God;
second, persons are in this state when they love God with all their
heart; in other words, with pure or unselfish love; third, there have
been instances of Christians, though probably few in number, who, so far
as can be decided by man’s imperfect judgment, have reached this state,
and it is the duty of all, encouraged by the ample provision which is
made, to strive to attain to it.” But the main issue was speedily
confused with an abundance of side questions, particular sentences and
parts of sentences being picked out for attack, much space being taken,
as in all such cases, with merely verbal criticisms founded on
misconceptions or on the necessary imperfection of language. The
celebrated Leibnitz remarked that, before the war of words between
Bossuet and Fénelon began, the prelates should have agreed on a
definition of the word love, and that such a definition might have
prevented the dispute. The worst thing was that Bossuet, driven to
extremities by the trouble he found in making headway theologically and
fearing defeat, descended to a personal attack on Fénelon’s character,
insinuating things which he had not the audacity to state plainly or the
facts to substantiate. This, of course, reacted. For Fénelon—against his
own wishes, but being shown the necessity of it by his friends—wrote a
marvelous reply, of which Charles Butler, one of his biographers, and by
no means a partisan one, says: “A nobler effusion of the indignation of
insulted virtue and genius, eloquence has never produced. In the very
first lines of it Fénelon placed himself above his antagonist, and to
the last preserves his elevation. Never did genius and virtue obtain a
more complete triumph. Fénelon’s reply, by a kind of enchantment,
restored to him every heart. Crushed by the strong arm of power,
abandoned by the multitude, there was nothing to which he could look but
his own powers. Obliged to fight for his honor, it was necessary for
him, if he did not consent to sink under the accusation, to assume a
port still more imposing than that of his mighty antagonist. Much had
been expected from him; but none supposed that he would raise himself to
so prodigious a height as would not only repel the attack of his
antagonist but entirely reduce him to the defensive.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account