[1] Like Claus I do not regard the eyes of the Crustacea as limbs, and
therefore admit no ocular segment; on the other hand I count in the
median piece of the tail, to which the character of a segment is often
denied. In opposition to its interpretation as a segment of the body,
only the want of limbs can be cited; in its favour we have the
relation of the intestine, which usually opens in this piece, and
sometimes even traverses its whole length, as in _Microdeutopus_ and
some other Amphipoda. In _Microdeutopus,_ as Spence Bate has already
pointed out, one is even led to regard small processes of this tubular
caudal piece as rudimentary members. Bell also (‘British Stalk-eyed
Crustacea’ p. xx), states that he observed limbs of the last segment
in _Palæmon serratus_ in the form of small moveable points.
The attempt has often been made to divide the body of the higher
Crustacea into small sections composed of equal numbers of
segments, these sections consisting of 3, 5 or 7 segments. None of
these attempts has ever met with general acceptance; my own
investigations lead me to a conception which nearly approaches Van
Beneden’s. I assume four sections of 5 segments each—the primitive
body, the fore-body, the hind-body, and the middle-body. The
primitive body includes the segments which the naupliiform larva
brings with it out of the egg; it is afterwards divided, by the
younger sections which become developed in its middle, into the
head and tail. To this primitive body belong the two pairs of
antennæ, the mandibles and the caudal feet (“posterior pair of
pleopoda,” Sp. B.). Even in the mature animal the fact that these
terminal sections belong to one another is sometimes betrayed by
the resemblance of their appendages, especially that of the outer
branch of the caudal feet, with the outer branch (the so-called
scale) of the second pair of antennæ. Like the antennæ, the caudal
feet may also become the bearers of high sensorial apparatus, as is
shown by the ear of _Mysis._
The sequence of the sections of the body in order of time seems
originally to have been, that first the fore-body, then the
hind-body, and finally the middle-body was formed. The fore-body
appears, in the adult animal, to be entirely or partially
amalgamated with the head; its appendages (_siagonopoda_ Westw.)
are all or in part serviceable for the reception of food, and
generally sharply distinguished from those of the following group.
The segments of the middle-body seem always to put forth limbs
immediately after their own appearance, whilst the segments of the
hind-body often remain destitute of feet through long portions of
the larval life or even throughout life (as in many female
Diastylidæ), a reason, among many others, for not, as is usual,
regarding the middle-body of the Crustacea as equivalent to the
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account