Facts and Assertions: or a Brief and Plain Exhibition of the Incongruity of the Peculiar Doctrines of the Church of Rome: With Those Both of the Sacred Scriptures and of the Early Writers of the Christian Church CatholicFaber, George Stanley
Religion
Facts and Assertions: or a Brief and Plain Exhibition of the Incongruity of the Peculiar Doctrines of the Church of Rome: With Those Both of the Sacred Scriptures and of the Early Writers of the Christian Church Catholic
Faber, George Stanley
Catholic Church -- Controversial literature
All, therefore, have been glorified and magnified, not through themselves
or through their own works of righteousness which they have done, but
through the will of God. Wherefore, being called through his will in
Christ Jesus, we are justified, not through ourselves, or through our own
wisdom or intellect or piety, or through the works which we have wrought
in holiness of heart; but through faith, by which the Almighty God has
justified us all from everlasting. {41d}
2. The author of the Epistle to Diognetus, in the first or second
century, speaks exactly to the same purpose.
What else can cover our sins, than the righteousness of Christ? In what
can we lawless and impious wretches be justified, save only in the Son of
God? {41e}
3. Ambrose of Milan, in the fourth century, still holds the same
language.
(1.) By what labours, by what injuries, can we lighten our sins? The
sufferings of this time are, in reference to future glory, altogether
unworthy. Hence, toward man, the form of celestial decrees proceeds, not
according to our merits, but according to the mercy of God. {42a}
(2.) Would that the Lord would not reject, but collect, this my mere
stubble in the harvest, these empty wild oats of my fructification!—It is
fitting, therefore, to believe; both that penance is to be performed, and
that pardon is to be granted: nevertheless, in such manner, that we
should hope for pardon, as from faith, not as from debt. {42b}
4. Augustine, in the fourth and fifth centuries, exactly agrees with his
predecessors.
The sins are thine: the merits are God’s. To thee punishment is due: and
when the reward shall come, he will crown his own gifts, not thy merits.
{42c}
IV. Let the patient enquirer now judge for himself: whether the romish
doctrine, that _Punishments_, _either self-inflicted_, _or commanded by a
priest_, _or sent in the course of God’s providence_, _can make
satisfaction to the Father through Christ in our behalf_, be the doctrine
either of Scripture or of the early Church.
V. But, if no man can make satisfaction for _his own_ sins: still less,
according to the monstrous phantasy of Supererogation, can he make
satisfaction for the sins of _others_.
Yet this impious absurdity was openly advanced in the papal bull for the
observation of a jubilee is the recent year 1825.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account