Facts and Assertions: or a Brief and Plain Exhibition of the Incongruity of the Peculiar Doctrines of the Church of Rome: With Those Both of the Sacred Scriptures and of the Early Writers of the Christian Church Catholic — John Shaqi
Facts and Assertions: or a Brief and Plain Exhibition of the Incongruity of the Peculiar Doctrines of the Church of Rome: With Those Both of the Sacred Scriptures and of the Early Writers of the Christian Church CatholicFaber, George Stanley
Religion
Facts and Assertions: or a Brief and Plain Exhibition of the Incongruity of the Peculiar Doctrines of the Church of Rome: With Those Both of the Sacred Scriptures and of the Early Writers of the Christian Church Catholic
Faber, George Stanley
Catholic Church -- Controversial literature
From whatever quarter the duty of such worship was learned by the Romish
Priesthood, it assuredly was _not_ learned from the Bible. The written
word of God neither enjoins it, nor gives a single instance of its ever
having being paid either in the time or with the sanction of the
Apostles.
5. EQUALLY SILENT also is the Bible, respecting the alleged
circumstance: that _The celebration of the Eucharist is a true
propitiatory sacrifice both for the quick and for the dead_.
The Church of Rome, indeed, teaches this doctrine: but she did _not_
learn it from Scripture.
III. We may now, with advantage, proceed to hear the declarations of the
Fathers concerning the sacrament of the Lord’s Supper.
1. Clement of Alexandria lived in the second century.
(1.) The Scripture has named wine A MYSTIC SYMBOL of the holy blood.
{14a}
(2.) Know well, that the Lord himself also partook of WINE: for he
himself also was a man. And he blessed the wine, saying: _Take_,
_drink_; _this is my blood_, _the blood of the vine_. The holy stream of
exhilaration ALLEGORICALLY REPRESENTS the Word, who poured himself out on
behalf of many, for the remission of sins. {14b}
2. Tertullian flourished at the end of the second and at the beginning
of the third century.
(1.) We must not call our senses in question, lest we should doubt
respecting their fidelity even in the case of Christ himself. For, if we
question their fidelity, we might be led to say: that Christ—TASTED A
DIFFERENT FLAVOUR OF THE WINE WHICH HE CONSECRATED IN MEMORY OF HIS OWN
BLOOD. {15a}
(2.) If Christ declares, that _The_ FLESH _profiteth nothing_; the sense
must be decided from the matter of the saying. For, because the Jews
deemed his discourse hard and intolerable, as if he had truly determined
that his FLESH was to be eaten by them: in order that he might dispose
the state of salvation TOWARD THE SPIRIT, he promised; _It is the_ SPIRIT
_that quickeneth_. And thus he subjoined: _The_ FLESH _profiteth
nothing_, namely, to quicken. There follows also, WHAT HE WOULD HAVE US
UNDERSTAND BY SPIRIT. _The words_, _which I have spoken unto you_, _are
spirit and life_. {15b}
(3.) Christ reprobated, neither the water of the Creator with which he
washes his people, nor the oil with which he anoints them, nor the
fellowship of honey and milk with which he feeds them as infants, nor the
BREAD by which he REPRESENTS his own body: for, even in his sacraments,
he needs the beggarly elements of the Creator. {15c}
3. Athanasius flourished in the fourth century.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account