Fancies Versus FadsChesterton, G. K. (Gilbert Keith)
General
Fancies Versus Fads
Chesterton, G. K. (Gilbert Keith)
English essays -- 20th century
Any one of the strange laws we suffer is a compromise between a fad and
a vested interest. The fashionable way of effecting a social reform is
as follows. To make the story clearer, and worthier of its wild and
pointless process, I will call the two chief agents in it the March Hare
and the Hatter. The Hatter is mad, in a quiet way; but he is merely mad
on making hats, or rather on making money. He has a huge and prosperous
emporium which advertises all possible hats to fit all possible heads;
but he certainly nourishes an occult conviction that it is really the
duty of the heads to fit the hats. This is his mild madness; in other
respects he is a stodgy and rather stupid millionaire. Now, the man whom
we will call the March Hare is at first sight the flat contrary of this.
He is a wild intellectual and the leader of the Hatless Brigade. It does
not much matter why there is this quarrel between the Hare and the Hat;
it may be any progressive sophistry. Perhaps it is because he is a March
Hare; and finds it hard to keep his hat on in a March wind. Perhaps it
is because his ears are too long to allow him to wear a hat; or perhaps
he hopes that every emancipated member of the Hatless Brigade will
eventually evolve ears as long as a hare’s--or a donkey’s. The point is
that anyone would fancy that the Hare and the Hatter would collide. As
a matter of fact they co-operate. In other words, every “reform” to-day
is a treaty between the two most influential modern figures--the great
capitalist and the small faddist. They are the father and mother of a
new law; and therefore it is so much of a mongrel as to be a monster.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account