Fancies Versus FadsChesterton, G. K. (Gilbert Keith)
General
Fancies Versus Fads
Chesterton, G. K. (Gilbert Keith)
English essays -- 20th century
For in this matter the modern mind is inconsistent with itself. It has
managed to get one of its rather crude ideals in flat contradiction to
the other. People of the progressive sort are perpetually telling us
that the hope of the world is in education. Education is everything.
Nothing is so important as training the rising generation. Nothing is
really important except the rising generation. They tell us this over
and over again, with slight variations of the same formula, and never
seem to see what it involves. For if there be any word of truth in all
this talk about the education of the child, then there is certainly
nothing but nonsense in nine-tenths of the talk about the emancipation
of the woman. If education is the highest function in the State, why
should anybody want to be emancipated from the highest function in the
State? It is as if we talked of commuting the sentence that condemned a
man to be President of the United States; or a reprieve coming in time
to save him from being Pope. If education is the largest thing in the
world, what is the sense of talking about a woman being liberated from
the largest thing in the world? It is as if we were to rescue her from
the cruel doom of being a poet like Shakespeare; or to pity the
limitations of an all-round artist like Leonardo da Vinci. Nor can
there be any doubt that there is truth in this claim for education. Only
precisely the sort of which it is particularly true is the sort called
domestic education. Private education really is universal. Public
education can be comparatively narrow. It would really be an
exaggeration to say that the schoolmaster who takes his pupils in
freehand drawing is training them in all the uses of freedom. It really
would be fantastic to say that the harmless foreigner who instructs a
class in French or German is talking with all the tongues of men and
angels. But the mother dealing with her own daughters in her own home
does literally have to deal with all forms of freedom, because she has
to deal with all sides of a single human soul. She is obliged, if not to
talk with the tongues of men and angels, at least to decide how much she
shall talk about angels and how much about men.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account