Fancies Versus FadsChesterton, G. K. (Gilbert Keith)
General
Fancies Versus Fads
Chesterton, G. K. (Gilbert Keith)
English essays -- 20th century
In short, the note of these notes, so to speak, is that it is only from
a normal standpoint that all the nonsense of the world takes on
something of the wild interest of wonderland. I mean it is only in the
mirror of a very moderate sense and sanity, which is all I have ever
claimed to possess, that even insanities can appear as images clear
enough to appeal to the imagination. After all, the ordinary orthodox
person is he to whom the heresies can appear as fantasies. After all, it
is we ordinary human and humdrum people who can enjoy eccentricity as a
sort of elfland; while the eccentrics are too serious even to know that
they are elves. When a man tells us that he disapproves of children
being told fairy-tales, it is we who can perceive that he is himself a
fairy. He himself has not the least idea of it. When he says he would
discourage children from playing with tin soldiers, because it is
militarism, it is we and not he who can enjoy in fancy the fantastic
possibilities of his idea. It is we who suddenly think of children
playing with little tin figures of philanthropists, rather round and
with tin top-hats; the little tin gods of our commercial religion. It is
we who develop his imaginative idea for him, by suggesting little leaden
dolls of Conscientious Objectors in fixed attitudes of refined
repugnance; or a whole regiment of tiny Quakers with little grey coats
and white flags. He would never have thought of any of these substitutes
for himself; his negation is purely negative. Or when an educational
philosopher tells us that the child should have complete equality with
the adult, he cannot really carry his idea any farther without our
assistance. It will be from us and not from him that the natural
suggestion will come; that the baby should take its turn and carry the
mother, the moment the mother is tired of carrying the baby. He will
not, when left to himself, call up the poetical picture of the child
wheeling a double perambulator with the father and mother at each end.
He has no motive to look for lively logical developments; for him the
assimilation of parent and child is simply a platitude; and an
inevitable part of his own rather platitudinous philosophy. It is we and
not he who can behold the whole vista and vanishing perspective of his
own opinions; and work out what he really means. It is only those who
have ordinary views who have extraordinary visions.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account