Fancies Versus FadsChesterton, G. K. (Gilbert Keith)
General
Fancies Versus Fads
Chesterton, G. K. (Gilbert Keith)
English essays -- 20th century
the unnatural solemnity, like an artificial vacuum, in which all these
modern experiments are conducted. But no doubt if Freud had enjoyed the
opportunity of explaining his ideas in an ancient ale-house, they would
have met with more spontaneous applause.
I hope I do not seem unsympathetic with Mr. Beresford; for I not only
admire his talent, but I am at this moment acting in strict obedience to
his theories. I am--I say it proudly--acting as a disciple of Freud, who
apparently forbids me to conceal any impulse, presumably including the
impulse to laugh. I mean no disrespect to Mr. Beresford; but my first
duty, of course, is to my own psychological inside. And goodness knows
what damage might not be done to the most delicate workings of my own
mental apparatus (as Mr. Arnold Bennett called it) if I were to subject
it to the sudden and violent strain of not smiling at the scientific
theory which is attractive because it is sexual, or of forcing my
features into a frightful composure when I hear of the spiritual
necessity for the liberation of impulse. I am not quite sure how far the
liberation of impulse is to be carried out in practice by its exponents
in theory; I do not know whether it is better to liberate the impulse to
throw somebody else out of an express train in order to have the
carriage to oneself all the way; or what may be the penalties for
repressing the native instinct to shoot Mr. Lloyd George. But obviously
the greater includes the less; and it would be very illogical if we were
allowed to chuck out our fellow-traveller but not to chaff him; or if I
were permitted to shoot at Mr. George but not to smile at Mr. Beresford.
And though I am not so serious as he is, I assure him that in this I am
quite as sincere as he is. In that sense I do seriously regret his
seriousness; I do seriously think such seriousness a very serious evil.
For some healthy human impulses are really the better for the relief by
words and gestures, and one of them is the universal human sense that
there is something comic about the relations of the sexes. The impulse
to laugh at the mention of morality as “free” or of sex science as
“attractive” is one of the impulses which is already gratified by most
people who have never heard of psycho-analysis and is only mortified by
people like the psycho-analysts.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account