Fancies Versus FadsChesterton, G. K. (Gilbert Keith)
General
Fancies Versus Fads
Chesterton, G. K. (Gilbert Keith)
English essays -- 20th century
Kipling if modified to meet the theories of Mr. Kidd? Believe me,
the proportions are as I have said. Art is long, but science is
fleeting; and Mr. Beresford’s subconsciousness, though stout and brave,
is in danger of being not so much a muffled drum as a drum which
somebody silences for ever; by knocking a hole in it, only to find
nothing inside. But there is one incidental moral in the matter that
seems to me topical and rather arresting. It concerns the idea of
punishment. The psycho-analysts continue to buzz in a mysterious manner
round the problem of Hamlet. They are especially interested in the
things of which Hamlet was unconscious, not to mention the things of
which Shakespeare was unconscious. It is in vain for old-fashioned
rationalists like myself to point out that this is like dissecting the
brain of Puck or revealing the real private life of Punch and Judy. The
discussion no longer revolves round whether Hamlet is mad, but whether
everybody is mad, especially the experts investigating the madness. And
the curious thing about this process is that even when the critics are
really subtle enough to see subtle things, they are never simple enough
to see self-evident things. A really fine critic is reported as arguing
that in Hamlet the consciousness willed one thing and the
subconsciousness another. Apparently the conscious Hamlet had
unreservedly embraced and even welcomed the obligation of vengeance, but
the shock (we are told) had rendered the whole subject painful, and
started a strange and secret aversion to the scheme. It did not seem to
occur to the writers that there might possibly be something slightly
painful, at the best, in cutting the throat of your own uncle and the
husband of your own mother. There might certainly be an aversion from
the act; but I do not quite see why it should be an unconscious
aversion. It seems just possible that a man might be quite conscious of
not liking such a job. Where he differed from the modern morality was
that he believed in the possibility of disliking it and yet doing it.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account