Fancies Versus FadsChesterton, G. K. (Gilbert Keith)
General
Fancies Versus Fads
Chesterton, G. K. (Gilbert Keith)
English essays -- 20th century
For the rest, if anybody wants to strike the central stream of moderate
sanity in the servant problem, I recommend him first to read with a
close attention or preferably to sing in a loud voice, the song called
“Sally in Our Alley.” In that great and gloriously English lyric, the
poet does not disguise the accidental discomforts of the great system of
apprenticeship which was part of the glory of the Guilds. He even
exhibits his Christian prejudices by comparing his master to a Turk. He
actually entertains, as every reflective social reformer must, the
hypothetical alternative of the Servile State, and considers the
relative advantages of a slave that rows a galley. But the point is that
what makes him refuse and endure is hope, the sure and certain hope of a
glorious emancipation; not the hopeless hope of a chance in a scramble,
with a general recommendation to get on or get out, but a charter of
knowledge and honour, that “when his seven long years are past,” a door
shall open to him, which our age has shut on the great multitude of
mankind.
The Slavery of Free Verse
The truth most needed to-day is that the end is never the right end. The
beginning is the right end at which to begin. The modern man has to read
everything backwards; as when he reads journalism first and history
afterwards--if at all. He is like a blind man exploring an elephant, and
condemned to begin at the very tip of its tail. But he is still more
unlucky; for when he has a first principle, it is generally the very
last principle that he ought to have. He starts, as it were, with one
infallible dogma about the elephant; that its tail is its trunk. He
works the wrong way round on principle; and tries to fit all the
practical facts to his principle. Because the elephant has no eyes in
its tail-end, he calls it a blind elephant; and expatiates on its
ignorance, superstition, and need of compulsory education. Because it
has no tusks at its tail-end, he says that tusks are a fantastic
flourish attributed to a fabulous creature, an ivory chimera that must
have come through the ivory gate. Because it does not as a rule pick up
things with its tail, he dismisses the magical story that it can pick up
things with its trunk. He probably says it is plainly a piece of
anthropomorphism to suppose that an elephant can pack its trunk. The
result is that he becomes as pallid and worried as a pessimist; the
world to him is not only an elephant, but a white elephant. He does not
know what to do with it, and cannot be persuaded of the perfectly simple
explanation; which is that he has not made the smallest real attempt to
make head or tail of the animal. He will not begin at the right end;
because he happens to have come first on the wrong end.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account