Fancies Versus FadsChesterton, G. K. (Gilbert Keith)
General
Fancies Versus Fads
Chesterton, G. K. (Gilbert Keith)
English essays -- 20th century
Perhaps the most modern equivalent to the man who makes a vow is the man
who makes a bet. But he must not hedge on a bet; still less must he
welsh, or do a bolt when he has made a bet. Even if the story ends with
his doing so, the dramatic emotion depends on our realizing the
dishonesty of his doing so. That is, the drama depends on the keeping or
breaking of a bond, if it be only a bet. A man wandering about a
race-course, making bets that nobody took seriously, would be merely a
bore. And so the hero wandering through a novel, making vows of love
that nobody took seriously, is merely a bore. The point here is not so
much that morally it cannot be a creditable story, but that artistically
it cannot be a story at all. Art is born when the temporary touches the
eternal; the shock of beauty is when the irresistible force hits the
immovable post.
Thus in the last novel of Mr. Wells, what is inconclusive in the second
part is largely due to what is convincing in the first part. By the time
that the hero meets his new heroine on Salisbury Plain, he has seriously
convinced us that there is nothing heroic about him, and that nothing
heroic will happen to him; at any rate in that department. He
disenchants the enchantment beforehand, and warns the reader against
even a momentary illusion. When once a man looks forward as well as
backward to disillusionment, no romance can be made of him.
Profligacy may be made romantic, precisely because it implies some
betrayal or breaking of a law. But polygamy is not in the least
romantic. Polygamy is dull to the point of respectability. When a man
looks forward to a number of wives as he does to a number of cigarettes,
you can no more make a book out of them than out of the bills from his
tobacconist. Anything having the character of a Turkish harem has also
something of the character of a Turkey carpet. It is not a portrait, or
even a picture, but a pattern. We may at the moment be looking at one
highly coloured and even flamboyant figure in the carpet; but we know
that on every side, in front as well as behind, the image is repeated
without purpose and without finality.
The Terror of a Toy
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account