Fancies Versus FadsChesterton, G. K. (Gilbert Keith)
General
Fancies Versus Fads
Chesterton, G. K. (Gilbert Keith)
English essays -- 20th century
Nevertheless this half-conscious buffoon who is the butt of our society
is also the satirist of it. He is even the judge of it, in the sense
that he is the normal test by which it will be judged. In a number of
quite practical matters it is he who represents historic humanity, and
speaks naturally and truthfully where his judges and critics are
crooked, crabbed and superstitious. This can be seen, for instance, if
we see him for a moment not in the dock but in the witness-box. In
several books and newspapers I happened to read lately, I have noticed a
certain tone touching the uneducated witness; phrases like “the
vagueness characteristic of their class,” or “easily confused, as such
witnesses are.” Now such vagueness is simple truthfulness. Nine times
out of ten, it is the confusion any man would show at any given instant
about the complications which crowd human life. Nine times out of ten,
it is avoided in the case of educated witnesses by the mere expedient of
a legal fiction. The witness has a brief, like the barrister: he has
consulted dates, he has made memoranda, he has frequently settled with
solicitors exactly what he can safely say. His evidence is artificial
even when it is not fictitious; we might almost say it is fictitious
even when it is not false. The model testimony, regarded as the most
regular of all in a law court, is constabulary testimony; if what the
soldier said is not evidence, what the policeman says is often the only
evidence. And what the policeman says is incredible, as he says it. It
is something like this: “I met the prisoner coming out of Clapham
Junction Station and he told me he went to see Mrs. Nehemiah Blagg, of
192, Paardeburg Terrace, West Ealing, about a cat which he had left
there last Tuesday week which she was going to keep if it was a good
mouser, and she told him it had killed a mouse in the back kitchen on
Sunday morning so he had better leave it. She gave him a shilling for
his trouble, and he went to West Ealing post-office where he bought two
halfpenny stamps and a ball of string, and then to the Imperial Stores
at Ealing Broadway, and bought a pennyworth of mixed sweets. Coming out
he met a friend, and they went to the Green Dolphin and made an
appointment for 5.30 next day at the third lamp-post in Eckstein
Street,” and so on. It is frankly impossible for anybody to say such a
sentence; still more for anybody to remember it. If the thing is not a
tissue of mere inventions, it can only be the arbitrary summary of a
very arbitrary cross-examination, conducted precisely as are the
examinations of a secret police in Russia. The story was not only
discovered bit by bit, but discovered backwards. Mountains were in
labour to bring forth that mouse in West Ealing. The police made a
thorough official search of the man’s mental boxes and baggage, before
that cat was let out of the bag. I am not here supposing the tale to be
untrue--I am pointing out that the telling of it is unreal. The right
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account