George III, King of Great Britain, 1738-1820; Great Britain -- History -- George III, 1760-1820
[114] "With respect to the son born of this marriage, and said to be
still living at the Cape of Good Hope, I think ... there must be some
mistake. I was at the Cape of Good Hope in 1830, and spent some time at
Mr. George Rex's hospitable residence at the Knysna. I understood from
him that he had been about thirty-four years in the colony, and I should
suppose he was about sixty-eight years of age, of a strong, robust
appearance, and the exact resemblance in features to George III. This
would bring him to about the time, as stated in Dr. Doran's work, when
George III married Hannah Lightfoot. On Mr. Rex's first arrival at the
colony, he occupied a high situation in the Colonial Government, and
received an extensive grant of land at the Knysna. He retired there, and
made most extensive improvements. His eldest son named John--at the time
I was there, lived with his father, and will now most probably be the
representative of George Rex."--William Harrison: _Notes and Queries_,
February 9, 1861.
The statement contradicted by Mr. Harrison had appeared in _Notes and
Queries_, October 24, 1868: "When the Duke of Edinburgh went sporting in
Cape Colony he was attended by George Rex and family, according to _The
Times_ account."
So far, then, Hannah Lightfoot (or Wheeler, or, as another writer says,
Whitefoot) was seen by the Prince of Wales on his visits to Parliament
(or, as it is otherwise stated by one who declared that the Prince would
not have passed by St. James's Market on his way to Parliament, or on
his way to the Opera), who fell in love with her, and secured the aid of
Miss Chudleigh to persuade her to leave her home, but his family, being
alarmed, paid Isaac Axford, shopman to Barton (or Bolton) to marry her,
and then she was at once (or after six weeks) taken into keeping by the
Prince. This is not very plain sailing, but the incident took place more
than sixty years before the discussion arose, and the discrepancies are
not unnatural after that lapse of time; but at least there has been
given the place and date of the marriage of Hannah with Isaac--Keith's
Chapel, 1754. Alexander Keith was a clergyman who married parties daily
between the hours of ten and four for the fee of one guinea, inclusive
of the licence, at the Mayfair Chapel to which he gave his name. These
marriages were irregular or "Fleet" marriages, and Keith's carelessness
in conducting them subjected him in October, 1742, to public
excommunication, when, in return, he as publicly excommunicated the
bishop of the diocese, and Dr. Trebeck, the rector of the neighbouring
St. George's, Hanover Square, on being told a stop would be put to his
marrying. "Then," said he, "I'll buy two or three acres of ground, and,
by God, I'll _underbury_ them all!" However, the Marriage Act of 1753
put a stop to his trade.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account