George III, King of Great Britain, 1738-1820; Great Britain -- History -- George III, 1760-1820
Majesty told them that they _were at liberty to vote against him and
keep their places_."[47]
[42] "Lord Rockingham afterwards declared that he had never enjoyed such
distinguished marks of the royal kindness as during a period when the
influence of Great Britain was paralysed; every foreign capital had the
knowledge that the existing Prime Minister would not remain in office
ten minutes after a successor could be found for him."--Trevelyan:
_Early Life of Fox_.
[43] Albemarle: _Memoirs of Rockingham_.
[44] _Ibid._
[45] _Bedford Correspondence._
[46] Basil Fielding, sixth Earl of Denbigh.
[47] Walpole: _Memoirs of George III_.
No self-respecting minister could tolerate this situation, and at the
beginning of February Lord Rockingham intimated to the King that "a
ministry undermined by the Household could not much longer drag on a
precarious existence;"[48] but his representation availed nothing, for a
day or two after, on some point in connexion with a Scotch petition,
ministers secured a victory only by 148 to 139 votes, on which occasion
in the minority were Lord Mountstuart, Jeremiah Dyson, a Lord of Trade,
Lord George Sackville, lately appointed by Lord Rockingham
Vice-Treasurer of Ireland, Lord Strange, Chancellor of the Duchy of
Lancaster, and several Grooms of the Bedchamber. Even more humiliating
was the defeat of the Government on February 3 in the House of Lords,
when the opposition carried the question "to enforce the execution of
the Stamp Act _vi et armis_," by 63 to 60 votes.
[48] Albemarle: _Memoirs of Rockingham_.
It seemed to all lookers-on that the days of the ministry were numbered.
"The situation of ministers became every day more irksome and
precarious," said Walpole; "the talk is of a new administration," Lord
Hardwicke informed his brother; and Lord Chesterfield wrote on February
10: "Most people think, and I among the rest, that the date of the
present ministers is pretty nearly out." The immediate result of these
manoeuvres was to damage the prestige of the ministry abroad, and, in
support of this statement, Lord Rockingham showed the King "an
intercepted letter of the Russian Minister to his Court, in which he
advised his mistress not to hasten to conclude the new treaty of
commerce between England and Russia with the present ministers, for
they could not maintain their ground. Lord Rockingham pointed out the
damage the King brought on his own affairs by having a ministry who did
not enjoy his confidence. This the King denied, and said they had his
confidence."[49]
[49] Walpole: _Memoirs of George III_.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account