Fatigue study : $b the elimination of humanity's greatest unnecessary waste. A first step in motion studyGilbreth, Lillian Moller
Science
Fatigue study : $b the elimination of humanity's greatest unnecessary waste. A first step in motion study
Gilbreth, Lillian Moller
Fatigue; Industrial efficiency; Motion study
It is not generally recognized that ultimate standards can best be
derived in the research room and laboratory. The standard practice
in the plant will be the result of the laboratory practice. If the
finer measurements are made in the shop during the general working
operations, much time will be lost, as shop conditions cannot be
controlled as laboratory conditions can. It has been said that
laboratory experimentation is not directly available in shop practice,
because laboratory conditions differ from shop conditions. They
certainly do differ, but so do the ultimate shop conditions that must
be introduced with the new standard method. The ultimate conditions in
the shop are far nearer the laboratory conditions than are the shop
conditions prior to installation of the new methods.
Former Method of Assembly.
The method of assembly in use before the motion study and fatigue study
were applied was as follows: The base of the braider was placed on an
ordinary low bench, and the various parts were kept in tote boxes or
on the floor. The worker selected such parts as he wished, and put
the braider together according to any traditional method that he had
learned, together with such changes as his whims dictated.
How the New Practice was Derived.
All of the previous assembly methods had been determined by the usual
practice of putting braider parts _together_. In the present case the
braider was taken apart; that is, handled in the reverse order of
assembly, in order to determine from a new viewpoint the best method
of putting the various parts together. The parts were laid out on a
table in the sequence in which they were disassembled. This allowed the
various members of the braider divisions, groups, and sub-groups to be
studied in relation to one another and also separately.
The Two Factors to Be Considered.
The problem resolved itself into two parts:
1. To make the table of the most convenient height and shape to hold
tools and the base group as it grew, while being assembled.
2. To provide the most convenient, temporary, resting place for the
tools and the various parts, before they were carried to the final
position of assembly.
The two parts were so closely related that any modification in one
demanded a modification in the other.
[Illustration: FIG. 25
Easel for simplifying motions and reducing fatigue from work of
assembly. The obvious sequence in our packet method eliminates the
delay and fatigue of the decision of choice.]
[Illustration: FIG. 26
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account