American fiction -- 20th century; Detective and mystery stories; Long Island (N.Y.) -- Fiction; Murder -- Investigation -- Fiction
Lamson paused. He remembered that the testimony of the two disinterested
witnesses, Mrs. Faulkner and Blake, went to show that these two women
were both there, near the victim, within a brief moment of the crime
itself. Who should say which was guilty, the jealous wife or the
disappointed girl?
And another point. Mrs. Faulkner and Blake had told in detail the
succession of events at the critical moment of the turning off the
lights, of the cry for help, and of their entrance; might not Joyce have
timed her story by this, and claimed an entrance at the same moment?
And, also, might not Natalie merely have patterned her recital after
that of Joyce? Which woman was guilty?
V
Blake's Story
The sapient gentlemen of the Coroner's Jury concluded, after a somewhat
protracted discussion, that Eric Stannard met his death at those
convenient and ever available hands of a person or persons unknown. They
could not bring themselves to accuse either Joyce or Natalie, because
for each suspect they had only the evidence of the other's unsupported
story. And Public Opinion, as represented by the citizens of Rensselaer
Park, would have risen in a body to protest against a verdict that
implicated either or both of these two women. And yet, there were many
exceptions. Many of those whose voices were loudest in declaring the
innocence of Joyce and Natalie, expressed private views that stultified
their statements. And some, wagged their heads wisely, and whispered a
thought of Blake. But most stood out strongly for the burglar theory,
ignoring all obstacles in the way of the marauder's entrance, and
repeatedly insisting that the non-appearance of the jewels was
sufficient proof of robbery.
It may be that Barry's self-confessed scratching of the paint on the
window-frame turned the trend of thought toward a possible burglar or
blackmailer, even if he gained entrance some other way; and it may be
this was the loophole through which the two suspected people escaped
accusation.
But the interest of the police in these two was strengthened rather than
lessened, and their life and conduct were under close scrutiny.
Captain Steele, who had been assigned to the case, declared that he was
glad of the verdict, for it was better to have the suspects at large,
and he was a firm believer in the principle of giving people sufficient
rope and allowing them the privilege of hanging themselves.
Captain Steele was at The Folly, as the house was always called,--in
spite of the Stannards' attempts to use the more attractive name of
Stanhurst,--on the day after the inquest, and Detective Roberts was also
there and one or two other policemen and reporters.
Steele had appropriated the small Reception Room next the studio for his
quarters, and was going over with great care the reports of the
proceedings and evidence of the day before.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account