American fiction -- 20th century; Detective and mystery stories; Long Island (N.Y.) -- Fiction; Murder -- Investigation -- Fiction
"This is the story," said Mrs. Faulkner. "About an hour ago, Mrs.
Stannard sent for me to come to her room. I went, and she showed me the
case of gems, saying she had found it on her dressing-table when she
awoke this morning. It was not there when she retired last night.
Further than that, she knows nothing about it."
"You mean, the jewels appeared there mysteriously?"
"Yes. She cannot account for it, herself. We have been talking it over,
and it seems to me the only explanation is that one of the servants took
them, and then decided to return them. Of course it would be practically
impossible for a servant to sell or dispose of them after the publicity
that has been given to the matter."
"Of course. But why a servant? Why not a guest--or a member of the
household,--or--or Mrs. Stannard, herself?"
"I!" exclaimed Joyce. "Why I've just found them!"
"Didn't you have them all the time?"
"Of course not! How dare you imply such a thing? This morning they were
in my room, last night they were not there. They were brought there
during the night. It is for you to find out who brought them."
"Was the door of your bedroom locked?"
"No. It is not our habit to lock our doors,--any of us. The outer doors
and windows are securely fastened, and we have no reason to distrust any
of the servants."
"Where were the gems this morning?"
"On my dressing-table, in my dressing-room, adjoining my sleeping room."
"Who do you think put them there?"
"Whoever stole them the night my husband was killed."
"And who do you think that was?"
"Whoever killed him, of course."
"Perhaps not," said Mrs. Faulkner, thoughtfully. "Perhaps the thief and
the murderer were not the same person."
"That may be so," agreed Bobsy. "Have you any theory or suspicion based
on the return of the jewels, Mrs. Faulkner?"
"No; except a general idea that the emeralds might have been stolen and
returned by a servant, and the murder committed by an intruder."
"Why not assume that the intruder also took the jewels?"
"Only because it would be difficult for him to get into the house and
return them to Mrs. Stannard. I can see no explanation of that act save
that a servant did it."
"Or an outsider with the connivance of one of the servants."
"Yes, that might be," agreed Mrs. Faulkner. "The mere placing of the
case in Mrs. Stannard's dressing-room would not be difficult. The doors
all over the house are open or unlocked at night, and a servant could
easily slip in and out of the room unheard."
"You heard no unusual sound in the night, Mrs. Stannard?"
"None," said Joyce.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account