It might be hastily inferred from the statistical identity of the
connection between, say, the right thumb and each of the two fore-fingers,
that the patterns on the two fore-fingers ought always to be alike,
whether arch, loop, or whorl. If X, it may be said, is identical both with
Y and with Z, then Y and Z must be identical with one another. But the
statement of the problem is wrong; X is not identical with Y and Z, but
only bears an identical amount of statistical resemblance to each of them;
so this reasoning is inadmissible. The character of the pattern on any
digit is determined by causes of whose precise nature we are ignorant; but
we may rest assured that they are numerous and variable, and that their
variations are in large part independent of one another. We can in
imagination divide them into groups, calling those that are common to the
thumb and the fore-finger of either hand, and to those couplets
exclusively, the A causes; those that are common to the two thumbs and to
these exclusively, the B causes; and similarly those common to the two
fore-fingers exclusively, the C causes.
Then the sum of the variable causes determining the class of pattern in
the four several digits now in question are these:--
Right thumb A + B + an unclassed residue called X(=1=)
Left thumb A + B + " " " X(=2=)
Right fore-finger A + C + " " " Z(=1=)
Left fore-finger A + C + " " " Z(=2=)
The nearness of relationship between the two thumbs is sufficiently
indicated by a fraction that expresses the proportion between all the
causes common to the two thumbs exclusively, and the totality of the
causes by which the A. L. W. class of the patterns of the thumbs is
determined, that is to say, by
A + B
----------------------- (1).
A + B + X(=1=) + X(=2=)
Similarly, the nearness of the relationship between the two fore-fingers
by
A + C
----------------------- (2).
A + C + Z(=1=) + Z(=2=)
And that between a thumb and a fore-finger by
A
--------------------------------------------------- (3).
A + B + C + X(=1=) (or X(=2=)) + Z(=1=) (or Z(=2=))
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account