Betrothal -- Fiction; England -- Social life and customs -- 20th century -- Fiction; Man-woman relationships -- Fiction
No, the protagonists must be at least in their quarter century. But what
would Mrs. Cloud, on the other hand, say to that? Slur over, if not
ignore, the first ten, let alone the first thirty, years of her son’s
life, we are, of course, at liberty to do. It is our affair! But, in
that case, the book, frankly, will not be worth reading. A character
such as Justin’s is not so easily deciphered. Thoroughly to appreciate
Justin we must begin at the beginning. We are probably not aware that he
weighed, at the very beginning, ten pounds. And speaking of teeth half a
page ago—do we know that there is a little white tooth, in a little
white thimble-box, in Mrs. Cloud’s big work-basket, that still bears
witness how unflinchingly, at five and a quarter, Henry Justin could
bear pain? Mrs. Cloud showed it to Laura one expansive day, and Laura,
fingering it as she listened to the anecdote that led so inevitably to
another anecdote, and another, and yet another, was whimsically jealous
that his mother should have had so much more of him than she. Had, as
she put it away again in the big basket under the pile of socks, a cold
eye for the exquisite darns: wondered that Justin had not got blisters
on his heel before now. And without an attempt at consistency, sat
herself meekly down at Mrs. Cloud’s feet to beg a darning lesson; which
Mrs. Cloud, with the discerning twinkle her son has not as yet acquired,
was very ready to give. They were excellent friends, those two. They had
affection, and that confident respect for each other which comes of
thinking exactly alike on an extremely important subject. They would
have both agreed, Collaborator, that to make our book a success, we
unquestionably must begin at the beginning—the beginning, of course, of
Henry Justin Cloud.
But I would rather talk about Laura.
I know the precedence is Justin’s: _for Adam was first formed, then
Eve_.... Yet Eve, bless her ingenuous, enterprising heart, is always so
much more interesting than Adam. If Adam were not in the Bible, wouldn’t
you call him ‘stodgy’? And don’t you think Eve did, under her breath?
‘Adam—what’s that, in that tree?
‘Look, Adam!
‘No, not there! Can’t you see where I’m pointing?
‘Rather like a pear, only round.
‘Adam, if you put your foot so—and swing yourself up.
‘Of course the branch will bear you!
‘Oh, Adam, you might!
‘I don’t want to eat it. I only want to know what it is.
‘I do think you might!
‘Don’t then!’
And there the serpent’s bright, unwinking eye catches hers, and the
serpent, all unperceived of Adam, whispers in her ear the one adjective
adequate to the situation.
And as, from that day to this, young birds have twittered as old birds
sing, I shouldn’t be surprised if Laura, in her turn, has had
moments—red, secret, shameful, iconoclastic moments when she, too, has
rolled the word relishingly over her tongue——
“Stodgy! Stodgy! Stodgy!”
But she was always very sorry afterwards. And so, I daresay, was Eve.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account