Fishes of the Big Blue River Basin, KansasMinckley, W. L.
Science
Fishes of the Big Blue River Basin, Kansas
Minckley, W. L.
Fishes -- Kansas
_Estimation of Relative Abundance_
Data on relative abundance of fishes were obtained by counts of seine
hauls at 29 of the 59 stations, counts of rotenoned fish at seven
stations, and results with the electric shocker at nine stations.
Counts were usually made in the field; however, in some collections
all fish were preserved and counted in the laboratory. Some fish (or
"swirls" presumed to be fish) observed while shocking were not
identified and are not included in the calculations. However, all fish
positively identified while shocking are included.
_Age and Growth of Fishes_
Fish from selected size-groups were aged in this study. Scales for
age-determinations were removed from positions recommended by Lagler
(1952:108). Scales were placed in water between glass slides and were
read on a standard scale-projection device.
Pectoral spines of catfish were removed from one or both sides,
sectioned, and read by methods described by Marzolf (1955:243-244).
Calculation of length at the last annulus for both scale-fish and
catfish was made by direct proportion. All measurements are of total
length to the nearest tenth of an inch unless specified otherwise.
_Creel Census_
From April 6 to May 28, 1957, a creel census was taken below Turtle
Creek Dam. From June 16 to July 24, 1958, I periodically visited the
main points of access to the Big Blue River, beginning approximately
eight miles downstream from Tuttle Creek Dam and ending six miles
upstream from the maximal extension of the reservoir at capacity
level. Access-points consisted of 11 bridges, two power dams, and
three areas where county roads approached the river. Eleven eight-hour
days were spent in the 1957 census and 22 checks in 15 days were made
in 1958. An equal number of morning (6:00 a.m. to 12:00 noon) and
afternoon (12:00 noon to 8:30 p.m.) checks were made.
Fishermen contacted were asked the following questions: home address
(or residence at the time of the fishing trip); time they started
fishing; kind of fish sought; number and kinds of fish in possession;
and baits used. Also, the number of poles and type of fishing (from
the bank, from boat, _etc._) were recorded. Fishes caught were
examined to confirm identifications. About 80 per cent of all
fishermen seen were contacted.
Fish per man-hour, as used in this report, refers to the average
number of fish of all species caught by one fisherman in one hour.
Fisherman-day is the average time spent fishing in one day by one
person. Because some fishermen used more than one pole, the data are
also expressed as catch per pole-hour.
COLLECTING STATIONS
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account