Five Natural Hybrid Combinations in Minnows (Cyprinidae)Cross, Frank B. (Frank Bernard)
Science
Five Natural Hybrid Combinations in Minnows (Cyprinidae)
Cross, Frank B. (Frank Bernard)
Cyprinidae
Produced by Chris Curnow, Erica Pfister-Altschul, Joseph
Cooper and the Online Distributed Proofreading Team at
http://www.pgdp.net
[Transciber's Note:
The follow suspected error has been corrected in this text:
Page 3: _C. erythogaster_ changed to _C. erythrogaster_]
UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS PUBLICATIONS
MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY
Volume 13, No. 1, pp. 1-18
June 1, 1960
Five Natural Hybrid Combinations
in Minnows (Cyprinidae)
BY
FRANK B. CROSS AND W. L. MINCKLEY
UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS
LAWRENCE
1960
UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS PUBLICATIONS, MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY
Editors: E. Raymond Hall, Chairman, Henry S. Fitch,
Robert W. Wilson
Volume 13, No. 1, pp. 1-18
Published June 1, 1960
UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS
Lawrence, Kansas
PRINTED IN
THE STATE PRINTING PLANT
TOPEKA, KANSAS
1960
[Illustration]
28-3424
Five Natural Hybrid Combinations in Minnows (Cyprinidae)
BY FRANK B. CROSS AND W. L. MINCKLEY
The hybrid fishes described herein are _Chrosomus erythrogaster_
(Rafinesque) × _Notropis cornutus frontalis_ (Agassiz), _C.
erythrogaster_ × _Semotilus atromaculatus_ (Mitchill), _Campostoma
anomalum plumbeum_ (Girard) × _S. atromaculatus_, _Gila nigrescens_
(Girard) × _Rhinichthys cataractae_ (Valenciennes), and _Notropis
venustus venustus_ (Girard) × _Notropis whipplei_ (Girard). Two of the
combinations have been reported, without descriptions, in literature
(citations below), and Hubbs (1955: Fig. 3) graphically indicated
hybridization between the same genera with which this paper is
concerned, but did not designate the species involved.
All specimens of _C. erythrogaster_ × _N. c. frontalis_, _C.
erythrogaster_ × _S. atromaculatus_, _C. a. plumbeum_ × _S.
atromaculatus_, and _N. v. venustus_ × _N. whipplei_ were taken in a
period of severe drought in Kansas and Arkansas. All were from small,
spring-fed streams that support large populations of fishes. That the
drought of 1953-1956 had pronounced effects on stream habitats in Kansas
has been documented by Minckley and Cross (1959). Satisfactory sites for
spawning may have been few, but an abundance of adult fishes persisted
from earlier, wet years. Unusual crowding of spawning fishes would
increase the opportunity for fertilization of the eggs of one species by
sperm from another species. We think that the hybrids reported here
(excepting _G. nigrescens_ × _R. cataractae_) are explainable on the
basis of crowding; we have no information about stream-conditions where
the last-named hybrid was found. Generally, hybridization of fishes
seems most common in areas that have been subject to radical climatic
change in the past 20,000 or fewer years (Hubbs, 1955:18-19), and in
streams that have been altered recently by the activities of man (Hubbs
and Strawn, 1956:342, and others). Streams from which we report hybrids
probably were affected by overgrazing of their watersheds; overgrazing
was unusually severe in the drought.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account