A British Commission has reported to Parliament that it takes three
times as much fodder to produce beef as it does to produce milk or pork
of the same food value. Since cows eat chiefly hay and grass and pigs
eat grain the cost of the production of a unit value of milk is much
less than the cost of the same value in the form of pork. It takes only
fifty per cent. more fodder to produce veal than to produce pork. Milk,
pork, and veal have long been the established protein-containing foods
of nations on the continent of Europe. According to these figures beef
should cost in the market twice what veal costs, and yet the butcher
charges nearly the same for the two. It would save food for milk
production if steers were eaten as veal and not fed up into beef cattle.
A suitable tax on all steers over a year old would accomplish this
result. If all heifers were developed into milch cows and no cow capable
of giving milk in quantity were slaughtered, the country would be placed
on a much better basis than at present. It might make beef expensive,
but there is every reason why it should be expensive. It would increase
the dairy business, which is evidently a need of the times, something
for the protection of the welfare of mankind. For it must be remembered
that a well-nourished cow during a single year will give in the form of
milk as much protein and two and a half times the number of calories as
are contained in her own body.
This was written before the publication of the following words of
Armsby, the foremost authority on animal nutrition:[2]
Roast pig, to those who like it, is not only a delicacy but a
valuable article of diet, but nevertheless, it is possible to
pay too high a price for it, and while a proposal to restrict
rather than to promote meat production in the present crisis
may appear both irrational and unpatriotic it may nevertheless
be in the interest of true food economy....
It may be roughly estimated that about 24 per cent. of the
energy of grain is recovered for human consumption in pork,
about 18 per cent. in milk and only about 3.5 per cent. in
beef and mutton. In other words, the farmer who feeds bread
grains to his stock is burning up 75 to 97 per cent. of them
in order to produce for us a small residue of roast pig, and
so is diminishing the total stock of human food....
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account