Foot-ball : $b its history for five centuries — John Shaqi
Foot-ball : $b its history for five centuriesVincent, James Edmund
History
Foot-ball : $b its history for five centuries
Vincent, James Edmund
Football
Be this as it may, it is probable that the Romans, along with their
other habits and fashions, imported the various games which they
played with the _follis_ or with other kinds of ball, into England.
One of these balls, used by the Romans, and by them derived from the
Greeks, was the _harpastum_, the game played with which was that the
players of one side should try to carry the ball over a line defended
by the other side, a pastime which bears no small resemblance to the
game of “hurling,” which we shall describe later. But whether football
was really introduced into Britain by the Romans, or whether it be
an indigenous product of the country, yet, with the exception of the
one doubtful reference to an anonymous manuscript to which allusion
has formerly been made, we do not find any mention of the game in the
annals of our Anglo-Saxon progenitors; and it is not until the 13th
century that we find genuine historical authority on the subject.
[Illustration]
[Illustration]
CHAPTER II.
_History of Football before the Puritan Era._
The first mention of the game of football in English history is made
by Fitz-Stephen, who, writing in the 13th century, says, “Annually
upon Shrove Tuesday they (the London school-boys) go into the fields
immediately after dinner and play at the celebrated game of ball
(_ludum pilæ celebrem_).” But it is only fair to add, that the learned
Strutt himself never felt certain that the reference here was to
football. He tells us, in his commentary upon the passage, that Stowe,
in his explanation of the words, has added, “without the least sanction
from the Latin,” the word bastion, “meaning a bat or cudgel,” being of
opinion that the game signified was something of the nature of goff
(golf) or bandy-ball (_sc._, hockey). If Stowe was guilty of this bold
gloss, and there is no question that he was, then it is clear that
the game of the London school-boys is as likely to have been football
as anything else, although Strutt is of the contrary opinion. For
Strutt’s view is based upon the ground that football, as a pastime,
“does not seem to be a very proper game for children.” On the other
hand, there are strong reasons for believing that this game may have
been football, for in the first place there is good historical evidence
to the effect that Shrove Tuesday was a regular day upon which the
London apprentices and those of other great cities, such as Chester,
and the Scotch peasants, regularly indulged in the game of football.
This evidence will be set forth immediately. But it is also a matter to
be noted, that London is one of the places where football seems never
to have died out, while the London schools, notably Westminster and
the Charterhouse, were the places in which one species of the game of
football was kept alive in a period of great athletic depression, to
emerge, at the time of the recent athletic revival, in the form of the
Association game.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account