For whose sake?: A sequel to "Why did he wed her?"Southworth, Emma Dorothy Eliza Nevitte
General
For whose sake?: A sequel to "Why did he wed her?"
Southworth, Emma Dorothy Eliza Nevitte
Bigamy -- Fiction; England -- Fiction; Impostors and imposture -- Fiction
“Your praise is enthusiastic, therefore extravagant.”
“It could not be. Ask Judy herself.”
“Ask a young woman still in love! She would be a very impartial witness,
no doubt,” laughed The O’Melaghlin. “But now about my boy?”
“He is altogether worthy of his sister and his brother-in-law. I could
not say any more for him than that.”
“Which is to say that he is good, true and brave.”
“Yes, he is all that.”
“But his objects in life?”
“To be of the best use to any whom he may serve; and the better to do
this, he wishes to get a good education.”
“Quite right! And he is young enough still to go to college, not being
quite twenty years of age.”
“Oh, I am so glad for his sake that you have come forward; because
Michael has that spirit of independence that he shrinks from being
indebted to his good brother-in-law for his college fees.”
“Quite right is that also. He is a true O’Melaghlin, and I am proud of
him! And now, my dear young lady, you may be wondering how I discovered
yourself and your husband and your connection—happy connection for
them—with my children.”
“It has been equally happy for us, sir, indeed. Michael and Judith are
among our most esteemed friends.”
“I am glad to hear you say so, dear madam.”
CHAPTER XXXIII
THE KINGLY O’MELAGHLINS
At this moment Cleve Stuart so quietly entered the room that Palma was
not aware of his entrance until he stood before her.
“Mr. O’Melaghlin—Mr. Stuart,” she said, presenting the gentlemen to each
other.
The visitor arose and both bowed.
“I bring a letter of introduction for you, sir, from the Messrs.
Walling, of New York,” said The O’Melaghlin, drawing from his breast a
neat, open envelope and handing it to Mr. Stuart.
Cleve took it with a bow.
On the envelope, besides the superscription—“To Cleve Stuart, Esq.,
Wolfscliff, W. V.,”—there was written between brackets, in the corner:
“To introduce The O’Melaghlin, Carrick Arghalee, Antrim.”
Now, the use of the definite article as the prefix of a man’s surname
had been a puzzle to Palma, and even a surprise to Cleve, though he
remembered that in the north of Ireland, as well as in Scotland, it was
affected by certain heads of families among the landed gentry of ancient
lineage, and considered to outrank either plain “Mr.” or “Squire.”
O’Melaghlin, therefore, must be recognized as The O’Melaghlin.
“With your permission,” said Stuart, with a bow, as he opened the
letter, which was as follows—and rather more than sarcastic in its
peculiar style, as Cleve thought when he read it, though he hoped and
believed that the bearer of the letter had not—if he had read the
words—perceived the sarcasm:
“OFFICE OF WALLING & WALLING, Att’ys, Etc.
“New York, May 8, 187—.
“CLEVE STUART, ESQ., Wolfscliff, W. V.: I have the great honor to
present—you—to The O’Melaghlin, of Carrick Arghalee, Antrim, Ireland.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account