Butterflies; Lamarck, Jean Baptiste Pierre Antoine de Monet de, 1744-1829
Before engaging in the study of practical zoology, Lamarck had
rendered himself conspicuous by the boldness and originality of his
speculations regarding a variety of physical phenomena. The general
laws of chemistry, the origin of the globe and its inhabitants, the
condition of the atmosphere and of living bodies, and most other great
questions fitted to attract an active fancy, had by turns been the
subjects of his contemplation; and on many of them he had elaborated
a theory which he conceived calculated to elucidate the most abstruse
phenomena they presented. To these views he attached the highest
importance, considering them destined to place almost every branch of
knowledge on a new and secure foundation. He therefore took advantage
of every opportunity to enforce and illustrate them, and they will be
found to pervade most of his published works, even such as afford no
obvious plea for their introduction. Although most of them are exploded
as fanciful and untenable, these theories display much ingenuity and
extensive knowledge, and a pretty full account of them is necessary to
show the character of Lamarck’s mind, and the wide range of his studies.
As early as 1780, he had presented his Theory of Chemistry to the
Academy of Sciences; but it was not published for several years
afterwards, when it appeared under the title of “Researches on the
Causes of the most important physical Facts, and particularly on those
of Combustion; of the raising of Water in the State of Vapour; of the
Heat produced by the Friction of solid Bodies against each other,” &c.
&c. A condensed view of the opinions promulgated in that work, and some
others on the same subject, is thus given by Cuvier. According to our
author, “Matter is not homogeneous; it consists of simple principles,
essentially different among themselves. The connexion of these
principles in compounds varies in intensity; they mutually conceal
each other, more or less, according as each of them is more or less
predominant. The principle of no compound is ever in a natural state,
but always more or less modified: as, however, it is not agreeable
to reason that a substance should have a tendency to depart from its
natural condition, it must be concluded, that combinations are not
produced by Nature, but that, on the contrary, she tends unceasingly to
destroy the combinations which exist, and each principle of a compound
body tries to disengage itself according to the degree of its energy.
From this tendency, favoured by the presence of water, dissolutions
result: affinities have no influence; and all experiments by which
it is attempted to be proved that water decomposes, and consists of
many kinds of air, are mere illusions, and that it is fire which
produces them. The element of fire[2] is subject, like the others, to
modification when combined. In its natural state, everywhere diffused
and penetrating every substance, it is absolutely imperceptible: only,
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account