Forerunners and rivals of Christianity : $b being studies in religious history from 330 B.C. to 330 A.D., Vol. 1 (of 2)Legge, Francis
Religion
Forerunners and rivals of Christianity : $b being studies in religious history from 330 B.C. to 330 A.D., Vol. 1 (of 2)
Legge, Francis
Christianity and other religions; Religions
N.B. The dates which follow are only approximate, no attempt having here
been made to harmonize the system of chronology lately adopted by the
professors of the Berlin school with those formerly in use. For the
dates of the reigns of the Egyptian and Asiatic Successors of Alexander,
I have mainly relied upon the excellent work of M. Bouché-Leclercq as
given in his French version of Droysen’s _Hellenismus_, his _Histoire
des Lagides_ and (especially) his _Histoire des Séleucides_, the second
volume of which, containing the chronological tables, maps, and indexes,
has appeared at the close of this year (1914). The dates of the Parthian
and Bactrian kings are given with all reserve and are in effect
conjectures based on the slipshod statements of compilers like Justin,
Quintus Curtius, and Trogus Pompeius. For the Parthian dates I have
followed, though without any confidence in its accuracy, the chronology
of Prof. Eduard Meyer, and for the Bactrian, those given in Mr. H. C.
Rawlinson’s _Bactria_.
The dates in Vol. II, which deals with the centuries after Christ, are
for the most part fairly well ascertained, and those given in Prof.
Bury’s edition of Gibbon have been used wherever possible. For matters
not mentioned in Gibbon, such as the lives of the obscurer Christian
Fathers and leaders of sects, recourse has generally been had to Smith
and Wace’s _Dictionary of Christian Biography_ and other books of the
kind. The only serious discrepancy here noticeable arises from the habit
still prevalent among certain Continental writers of beginning the
Christian Era four years earlier than others, so as to increase all
subsequent dates by 4. Thus M. Cumont, in his _Mystères de Mithra_ and
elsewhere, invariably gives the date of the Carnuntum inscription
proclaiming Mithras the Protector of the Roman Empire, as 307 A.D.,
although he asserts that the _Iovii et Herculi religiosissimi Augusti_
responsible for the inscription are Diocletian and Galerius. Diocletian,
however, resigned the purple, and retired into private life in the year
305 A.D., by the reckoning of Prof. Bury and others, and it is plain
therefore that M. Cumont puts the date too far forward according to our
ideas. To bring it into line, I have therefore ventured to alter the
date of the inscription quoted by him to 304 A.D., which would moreover
coincide with the persecution of the Christians, which he thinks may
have owed some of its severity to the rivalry of the Mithraic faith. The
same procedure has been followed in one or two other cases.
336. Accession of Alexander.
340 to 260. Zeno of Citium (founder of Stoic school) flourished.
340 to 288. Pyrrho of Elis flourished.
334 to 322. Aristotle and first Peripatetic School flourished.
331. Foundation of Alexandria.
Alexander transports many Jews to Alexandria and gives them equal
rights with Macedonians.
330. Death of Darius.
326. Alexander conquers Punjab.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account