Forerunners and rivals of Christianity : $b being studies in religious history from 330 B.C. to 330 A.D., Vol. 1 (of 2)Legge, Francis
Religion
Forerunners and rivals of Christianity : $b being studies in religious history from 330 B.C. to 330 A.D., Vol. 1 (of 2)
Legge, Francis
Christianity and other religions; Religions
When Alexander’s marshals began immediately after his death to divide
his Empire among them, and Ptolemy the son of Lagos claimed and received
for his share the province of Egypt, his more ambitious fellows must
have smiled at his moderation. Egypt was an acquisition that had never
been properly assimilated by the Persians, and although subjugated by
Cambyses very early in their history, had more than once broken out into
successful rebellion. Its inhabitants, then as now, were a race
separated from the rest of the world by peculiarities of climate,
devotedly attached to their own traditional institutions, and bitterly
and obstinately hostile to the foreigner. Moreover, the enormous
resources of the country were undeveloped, the importance of its new
capital of Alexandria as the natural entrepôt of trade between East and
West[103] had not then been made manifest, and the agricultural wealth
which was afterwards to make Egypt the granary of Europe had been ruined
by civil commotions and foreign invasions. Although Alexander was hailed
by the Egyptians as a deliverer, and, like other conquerors before and
after him, found little difficulty in coming to terms with the colleges
of greedy and unpatriotic priests who were ready to welcome any foreign
master so long as their own position was assured[104], he seems to have
felt less interest in the unwarlike and servile _fellahin_ than in the
free warriors of Bactria and India who had fought so gallantly against
him. Hence, he paid little attention to their government, and Cleomenes,
the ruler he had set over Egypt, thus found himself free to practise
extortion on a scale which would certainly have brought down upon him
the condign vengeance of his master had it taken place further
east[105]. Or perhaps the Great Conqueror, among whose gifts the habit
of attending to everything in its turn must certainly be reckoned,
thought it well to let all things grow together till the harvest, in the
consciousness that the campaign in Arabia, on which he was bent when
struck down by the fatal fever, would bring him close to the confines of
Egypt and therefore in a position to investigate on the spot the
complaints against Cleomenes which had already come to his ears. Be this
as it may, one of Ptolemy’s first acts on reaching his satrapy was to
seize Cleomenes and to put him to death, a proceeding which had, we
learn, the full approval of his new subjects. This was but the earliest
of a long list of benefits which his rule was to confer upon them, and
which under his successors were to raise Egypt to a greater height of
prosperity than she had ever enjoyed under her native Pharaohs.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account