Euhemerus’ work was one of the first Greek books to be translated into Latin. See Cicero, _De Nat. Deor._ c. 42. Footnote 87: Droysen, _op. cit._ III. p. 341, n. 3. Rhys Davids, _Buddhist India_, 1903, p. 298, thinks it possible that the missions although duly recorded on stone were never sent. Footnote 88: See Chapter II _infra_. Footnote 89: Foucart, _Les Associations Religieuses_, etc., pp. 66-84. Cf. Maury, _Rel. de la Grèce_, II. p. 427. The composition of hymns was peculiarly the care of these associations; Foucart, _op. cit._ p. 114. Footnote 90: Foucart, _op. cit._ p. 85. Footnote 91: Franz Cumont, “Hypsistos,” _Revue de l’Instruction publique en Belgique_, 1897, pp. 5-6; _id._ _Les Religions Orientales dans le Paganisme Romain_, Paris, 1906, p. 155 and note. Footnote 92: Foucart, _Ass. Rel._ pp. 135, 136, 158. Footnote 93: See Chapter IV _infra_. Footnote 94: Plutarch, _Alexander_, c. II. Footnote 95: See Foucart, _op. cit._ p. 158, for the cases of Ninos and Theoris, priestesses who were condemned for such traffic. Footnote 96: Plutarch, _Pythian Responses_, c. XXV. Footnote 97: Lucian, _Alexander or Pseudomantis_, _passim_. The story is well summarized by Sir Samuel Dill, in _Nero to Marcus_, pp. 473 _sqq._ Footnote 98: Léon Fivel, “Le Dieu Glycon à Nicomédie,” _Gazette Archéol._ 1879, p. 186. Footnote 99: Maury, _Rel. de la Grèce_, II. pp. 418 _sqq._ Cf. Döllinger, _Judenthum und Heidenthum_ (English edition), I. p. 214. Footnote 100: Foucart, _Ass. Rel._ pp. 33-35. Footnote 101: _Id._ _op. cit._ pp. 150, 151. Footnote 102: Hogarth, _Philip and Alexander_, pp. 277, 282. Cf. Bouché-Leclercq in Droysen, _op. cit._ I. p. vii. CHAPTER II THE ALEXANDRIAN DIVINITIES