Forerunners and rivals of Christianity : $b being studies in religious history from 330 B.C. to 330 A.D., Vol. 1 (of 2)Legge, Francis
Religion
Forerunners and rivals of Christianity : $b being studies in religious history from 330 B.C. to 330 A.D., Vol. 1 (of 2)
Legge, Francis
Christianity and other religions; Religions
himself with horse, fought three desperate battles with Set, many of
whose followers came over to him. But, although he defeated his foe, he
did not put an end to his existence, and Set still lives, haunting the
deserts and wild places, and even, according to one variant of the
story, ruling for a time over the south of Egypt (or perhaps only a part
of it), while the sway of Horus over the north remained unchallenged. As
for the other gods of the cycle, Nephthys, the twin sister and
reflection of Isis, was the wife of Set, but preferred to throw in her
lot with Osiris, by whom she had a son, Anubis the jackal, the messenger
of Osiris, who possessed many of the attributes of the Greek Hermes. So,
too, Thoth, the ibis, was the judge who pronounced, or perhaps merely
recorded, the final partition or arrangement between Horus and Set, and
most of the other members of the Egyptian Pantheon were brought into the
cycle one way or the other.
This is the legend of Osiris, as we find it in the tract _de Iside et
Osiride_, which is generally attributed to Plutarch and was certainly
written in the first century A.D. It has not been met with earlier in a
connected form; but its main incidents are sufficiently corroborated by
the monuments of the time to convince us that it fairly represents the
popular belief of the Egyptians during the Ptolemaic period[120].
Plutarch, or the writer who assumed his name, gives us more than one
explanation of it coupled with analogies drawn from other mythologies,
which exhibit considerable archaeological knowledge and show us how far
the comparative study of religions had proceeded even in his time. When
he fails, it is generally from lack of acquaintance with the earlier
forms of the religions of Egypt, which had evidently become in those
days as much a mystery to the priests as to their flocks, and which the
labours of modern Egyptologists have but recently begun to recover for
us. Looked at by their light, and stripped of its many transparent
inconsistencies and anachronisms, it seems plain that the story is not
simple but compound, and represents an attempt to fuse together the
religious ideas either of different peoples or of the same people at
different stages of culture[121]. In the first place, we see in it the
animal gods of Egypt—Horus the falcon, Set the unknown animal or _scha_
sacred to him, Anubis the jackal, and Thoth the ibis—whom we now know to
have been the totems or rallying-signs of the different tribes who
invaded Egypt, probably from other parts of Africa, in predynastic
times. The _Sches-Hor_ or Followers of Horus are so often alluded to in
early dynastic texts that there can be no doubt that the tribe who had
the falcon for their banner were originally the royal or leading tribe
of these invaders. The memory of this fact was preserved in the custom,
going back to the beginning of the Ist Dynasty, which assigned to the
ruler of Egypt on his coronation a special name differing from that by
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account