Forerunners and rivals of Christianity : $b being studies in religious history from 330 B.C. to 330 A.D., Vol. 2 (of 2)Legge, Francis
Religion
Forerunners and rivals of Christianity : $b being studies in religious history from 330 B.C. to 330 A.D., Vol. 2 (of 2)
Legge, Francis
Christianity and other religions; Religions
Of these treatises, the two, which, up to about sixty years ago, formed
our main sources of information with regard to the Gnostics of the
sub-Apostolic age[35], are the writings of St Irenaeus, Bishop of Lyons
about the year 177 A.D., and of Epiphanius, Bishop of Constantia in
Cyprus, who tells us he wrote in the seventh year of Gratian or 374 A.D.
The first of these is considerably later in date than the heresiarchs in
refutation of whose doctrines he wrote his five books “against
Heresies”; and although he is most probably honest in his account of
their tenets, it is evident that Irenaeus was incapable of
distinguishing between the opinions of the founders of the sects which
he controverts and those of their followers and successors. Epiphanius,
on the other hand, wrote when the Catholic Church was already
triumphant, and his principal object seems to have been to blacken the
memory of those competitors whom she had already outdistanced in the
race for popularity and power. Hence he spares no pains to rake together
every story which theological hatred and unclean imagination had ever
invented against her opponents and rivals; while his contempt for
consistency and the rules of evidence show the intellectual depths to
which the war which orthodox Christianity had from the first waged
against Hellenistic culture had reduced the learning of the age. The
language in which he and the other Catholic writers on heresy describe
the Gnostics is, indeed, the first and most salient instance of that
intolerance for any other opinions than their own, which a recent writer
of great authority declares the Apostles and their successors derived
from their Jewish nationality[36]. “The first-born of Satan,” “seducers
of women,” “savage beasts,” “scorpions,” “ravening wolves,” “demoniacs,”
“sorcerers,” and “atheists” were the mildest terms in which Epiphanius
and his fellow heresiologists can bring themselves to speak of the
sectaries. They afford ample justification for the remark of the
philosophic Emperor Julian that “no wild beasts are so hostile to men as
Christian sects in general are to one another[37].”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account