Neander _Antignostikus_, Eng. ed. vol. II. p. 490, calls him the representative of the Protestant spirit. In modern times, it is perhaps sufficient to notice Harnack’s predilection, as shown in his _Dogmengeschichte_, for Marcion and his works. Foakes-Jackson, _Some Christian Difficulties of the Second and Twentieth Centuries_ (Hulsean Lectures), Cambridge, 1903, pp. 19 _sqq._, thinks the study of the controversy between Marcion and Tertullian should especially appeal to Modernists. Footnote 740: Hippolytus, _op. cit._ Bk VII. c. 29, p. 378, Cruice. Footnote 741: Epiphanius, _Haer._ XLII. p. 556, Oehler. Footnote 742: _Op. et loc. cit._ Footnote 743: Tertullian, _adv. Marc._ Bk IV. c. 11. Cf. p. 207, _supra_. Footnote 744: Tertullian, _op. cit._ Bk I. c. 27. Footnote 745: Harnack in _Encyclopaedia Britannica_ (11th ed.) _s.v._ “Marcion.” Footnote 746: He always couples Valentinus and Marcion together. Cf. _de Praescpt._ cc. XXIX., XXX. Justin Martyr, Marcion’s contemporary, says (_First Apolog._ c. XXVI.) that “he is even now teaching men of every nation to speak blasphemies.” Renan, _L’Égl. Chrétienne_, p. 363, thinks that the Marcionites were “much the most numerous sect before Arius.” Footnote 747: Foakes-Jackson, _Hulsean Lectures_, p. 108. Cf. Sanday, _The Gospels in the 2nd Cent._, Oxford, 1876, p. 236. Footnote 748: Theodoret, _Epp._ 113 and 145. Footnote 749: συμμισούμενοι καὶ συνταλαίπωροι: Tertullian, _adv. Marc._ Bk IV. cc. 9, 30. Footnote 750: See Neander, _Ch. Hist._ vol. II. pp. 151 _sqq._ and Matter, _Hist. du Gnost._ t. II. pp. 298, 304. Footnote 751: