Hahn, in his _Antitheses Marcionis gnostici_, Königsberg, 1823, claimed to have restored this book, while Hilgenfeld has examined the extant remains of Marcion’s Gospel in _Das Evangelium Marcions_. He attempted to restore Marcion’s _Apostolicon_ in the _Zeitschr. für hist. Theol._ 1855. Footnote 714: The _Antitheses_ seem to have been seen by Photius in the Xth century, so that we need not despair. Footnote 715: Like the Eros-Phanes of the Orphics and the Ophite Agape. So Pausanias, Bk IX. c. 27, says the Lycomidae sang in the Mysteries hymns to Eros, which he had read, thanks to a δαδοῦχος or torch-bearer at Eleusis. Footnote 716: Tertullian, _adv. Marc._ Bk I. c. 2, says that Marcion is obliged to admit the existence of a Creator, because his work is manifest; but that he will never be able to prove that of a higher God than he—a mode of reasoning which might take him further than he intends. Footnote 717: Isaiah, xlv. 7. Footnote 718: Tertullian, _adv. Marc._ Bk III. c. 8. Footnote 719: Neander, _Ch. Hist._ II. pp. 142 _sqq._ Footnote 720: Tertullian, _adv. Marc._ Bk III. c. 24. Footnote 721: _Op. cit._ Bk III. c. 4. Cf Neander, _Ch. Hist._ II. p. 144. Footnote 722: Tertullian, _op. cit._ Bk V. c. 1. Footnote 723: Gal. i. 1. Tertullian, _adv. Marc._ Bk V., contains most of Marcion’s dealings with the Pauline Epistles. Footnote 724: Gal. i. 6, 7. Footnote 725: Gal. ii. 11 _sqq._ Footnote 726: Gal. iii. 14. Footnote 727: 1 Cor. i. 21. Footnote 728: Tertullian, _adv. Marc._ Bk V. c. 5. Footnote 729: 2 Cor. iv. 4. Cf. Tertullian, _op. cit._ Bk V. c. 11. Footnote 730: Tertullian, _op. cit._ Bk V. c. 14. Footnote 731: Rom. x. 2, 3. Footnote 732: 2 Thess. i. 8. Cf. Tertullian, _op. cit._ Bk V. c. 16. Footnote 733: Epiphanius, _Haer._ XLII. p. 676, Oehler; Tertullian, _loc. cit._ Footnote 734: Ephes. iii. 8, 9. Footnote 735: Tertullian, _op. cit._ Bk V. c. 18. Footnote 736: But see n. 2, p. 217, _infra_. Footnote 737: As is plain from the words of Plutarch quoting, as is generally thought, Theopompus of Chios. See _Is. et Os._ cc. XLVI., XLVII. Al-Bîrûnî, _Chronology_, p. 189, says indeed that both Bardesanes and Marcion borrowed from Zoroaster. But this was eight centuries after Marcion’s death, and we have no evidence as to Al-Bîrûnî’s means of knowledge of his tenets. Footnote 738: Harvey’s _Irenaeus_, I. p. cli. There is a curious resemblance to Marcion’s Demiurge in the Clementine _Homilies_, XX. c. 2, where the king of this world who rules by law and rejoices in the destruction of sinners is mentioned. But the _Homilies_ are probably Ebionite and certainly, in the form in which they have come down to us, later than Marcion. Footnote 739: