Forerunners and rivals of Christianity : $b being studies in religious history from 330 B.C. to 330 A.D., Vol. 2 (of 2)Legge, Francis
Religion
Forerunners and rivals of Christianity : $b being studies in religious history from 330 B.C. to 330 A.D., Vol. 2 (of 2)
Legge, Francis
Christianity and other religions; Religions
The case is different with Ormuzd’s enemy Ahriman, who evidently was
known by his Persian name to the Roman worshippers of Mithras. In the
Vatican can be seen a triangular marble altar dedicated by a
_clarissimus_ named Agrestius who was a high-priest of Mithras, to “the
god Arimanius[825],” and altars with similar inscriptions have been
found at Buda-Pesth[826]. At a Mithraic chapel in York also, there was
found a statue, now in the Museum of the Philosophical Society in that
city, which bears an inscription to the same god Arimanius[827]. There
is therefore fairly clear evidence that the Mithraists recognized
Ahriman under his Persian name, and that they sacrificed to him, as
Plutarch said the “magi” of his time did to the god whom he calls
Hades[828], and this agrees with Herodotus’ statement that the Persians
used to do the same to “the god who is said to be beneath the
earth[829].” Although this gave occasion to the Christian Fathers to
accuse the Mithraists of worshipping the devil, we are not thereby bound
to conclude that they looked upon Arimanius as an essentially evil
being. It seems more probable that they considered him, as the Greeks
did their Hades or Pluto, as a chthonian or subterranean power ruling
over a place of darkness and discomfort, where there were punishments
indeed, but not as a deity insusceptible of propitiation by
sacrifice[830], or compulsion by other means such as magic arts[831]. It
has been shown elsewhere that his image in a form which fairly
represents his attributes in this capacity appears with some frequency
in the Mithraic chapels, where a certain amount of mystery attached to
its exhibition[832]. It seems to follow from these considerations that
the worshippers of Mithras attributed to their special god no
inferiority to Ahriman as M. Cumont’s argument supposes, and that the
only power whom they acknowledged as higher than Mithras himself was the
Roman equivalent of Ormuzd, the Jupiter Optimus Maximus adored
throughout the Roman Empire of their time as the head of the
Pantheon[833].
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account