Forerunners and rivals of Christianity : $b being studies in religious history from 330 B.C. to 330 A.D., Vol. 2 (of 2)Legge, Francis
Religion
Forerunners and rivals of Christianity : $b being studies in religious history from 330 B.C. to 330 A.D., Vol. 2 (of 2)
Legge, Francis
Christianity and other religions; Religions
However this may be, the Legend of Mithras, as thus portrayed, shows
with fair closeness the belief of his worshippers as to his place in the
scheme of the universe. Mithras was certainly not the Supreme God, a
rank in the system filled by Ahura Mazda, or his Latin counterpart,
Jupiter Best and Greatest[880]. But this being, like the Platonic Zeus
and the Gnostic Bythos, was considered too great and too remote to
concern himself with the doings of the visible universe, in which
Mithras acts as his vicegerent. Whether Mithras was or was not
considered as in some sort the double or antitype of the Supreme Being
cannot be said; but it is worth noticing that in the Vedas, as among the
Hittites, Varuna and Mitra form an inseparable couple who are always
invoked together, and that the same seems to have been the case with
Ahura Mazda and Mithra in the oldest religious literature of the
Persians[881]. It may therefore well be that the learned doctors of the
Mithraic theology regarded their Supreme Being and Mithras as two
aspects of the same god, an idea that, as we have seen, was current at
about the same period among the Gnostics. It is, however, impossible to
speak with certainty on such a point in the absence of any writings by
persons professing the Mithraic faith, and it is highly improbable that
the rugged soldiers who formed the majority of the god’s worshippers
ever troubled themselves much about such questions. For them, no doubt,
and for all, perhaps, but a few carefully-chosen persons, Mithras was
the Demiurge or Divine Artizan of the universe[882], which he governs in
accordance with the laws of right and justice, protecting and defending
alike man and those animals and plants useful to him which Mithras has
himself created from his own spontaneous goodness. Hence he was the only
god to whom they admitted allegiance, and although the existence of
other heavenly beings was not denied, it is probable that most of them
were looked upon as occupying at the best a position less important to
us than that of Mithras himself.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account