Forerunners and rivals of Christianity : $b being studies in religious history from 330 B.C. to 330 A.D., Vol. 2 (of 2)Legge, Francis
Religion
Forerunners and rivals of Christianity : $b being studies in religious history from 330 B.C. to 330 A.D., Vol. 2 (of 2)
Legge, Francis
Christianity and other religions; Religions
tunic and golden crown, clothed in anaxyrides, holding in his right hand
the golden shoulder of a young bull.” This, _i.e._ the shoulder, we are
told, is called “Arctos, who moves the sky, making it to turn forwards
and backwards according to the hour.” But the god appears to be intended
for Mithras, and the shoulder of the bull is probably an allusion to the
bull-slaying scene which may serve to show that there were more
interpretations than one placed upon the Tauroctony. The initiate hails
this god as “Lord of water, consecrator of the earth, ruler of the air,
shining-rayed One, of primeval rays!” and the like, and continues:
“O Lord, having been born again, I die! Having increased and again
increasing, I come to an end by life-begotten birth, and coming into
existence, and having been released unto death, I pursue my way, as
thou hast ordered from the beginning, as thou hast ordained: And
having accomplished the mystery, I am _Pheroura miouri_.”
Here the fragment abruptly breaks off, and plunges into directions for
the manufacture of oracles and the other stuff common in Magic Papyri.
One is not much inclined to believe with M. Cumont that the author of
the galimatias knew nothing about Mithraism[964], and merely introduced
Mithras’ name into his opening to impress his readers with a sense of
the value of his recipes. It seems more likely that the writer of the
fragment had really got hold of some part of a Mithraic ritual, which he
had read without understanding it, and that he was trying to work more
or less meaningless extracts from it into his spells on the same
principle that the sorcerers of the European Renaissance used when they
took similar liberties with the words of the Mass. If this view be
adopted, it follows that the concluding words given above confirm the
view that the Mithraists, like the Orphics before them, taught the
metempsychosis or reincarnation of souls[965]. Did the Mithraist think
that his soul, when released from this “dread necessity,” finally
escaped from even the planetary spheres and, raising itself into the
heaven of the fixed stars, became united with the Deity Himself? We can
only ask the question without being able to suggest an answer supported
by any evidence.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account