Forerunners and rivals of Christianity : $b being studies in religious history from 330 B.C. to 330 A.D., Vol. 2 (of 2) — John Shaqi
Forerunners and rivals of Christianity : $b being studies in religious history from 330 B.C. to 330 A.D., Vol. 2 (of 2)Legge, Francis
Religion
Forerunners and rivals of Christianity : $b being studies in religious history from 330 B.C. to 330 A.D., Vol. 2 (of 2)
Legge, Francis
Christianity and other religions; Religions
The element which the Jews of Asia contributed to Anatolian religion at
this period was probably more important than has been generally
supposed. M. Cumont’s theory that the epithet of the “Highest” (Ὕψιστος)
often applied to the God of Anatolia and Syria really covers the
personality of Yahweh of Israel rests upon little proof at present[109].
It may be conceded that the tendency to monotheism—or to speak strictly
their hatred for the worshippers of many gods—rooted in the Jews from
the Captivity onwards may at first have done much to hasten the progress
of the _theocrasia_ which was welding all the gods of the Mysteries into
one great God of Nature. But the Babylonian or Oriental Jews, called in
the Talmud and elsewhere the Ten Tribes, probably had some inborn
sympathy with the more or less exalted divinities of the West. Even in
the temple of Jerusalem, Ezekiel sees in his vision “women weeping for
Tammuz[110],” while Jeremiah complains of the Jews making cakes to the
Queen of Heaven, which seems to be another name for the Mother of the
Gods[111]. The feminine side of the Anatolian worship can therefore have
come to them as no new thing. Perhaps it was due to this that they so
soon fell away from their ancestral faith, and that, in the words of the
Talmud, “the baths and wines of Phrygia separated the Ten Tribes from
their brethren[112].” That their collection of money for the Temple in
Roman times was due not so much to any religious motive, as to some of
the financial operations in which the Jews were always engaging, Cicero
hints with fair plainness in his Oration in defence of Flaccus[113].
They seem, too, to have intermarried freely with the Greek citizens,
while the sons of these mixed marriages did not undergo the circumcision
which the Jews of the Western Dispersion demanded not only from native
Jews but also from proselytes of alien blood[114].
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account