Forerunners and rivals of Christianity : $b being studies in religious history from 330 B.C. to 330 A.D., Vol. 2 (of 2)Legge, Francis
Religion
Forerunners and rivals of Christianity : $b being studies in religious history from 330 B.C. to 330 A.D., Vol. 2 (of 2)
Legge, Francis
Christianity and other religions; Religions
However this may be, there is a fair consensus of opinion among the
Fathers of the Church as to the doctrines current among those whom, for
reasons to be presently seen, they called the Ophites or worshippers of
the Serpent. The aim of the sect seems to have been to produce an
eclectic system which should reconcile the religious traditions current
from time immemorial in Western Asia with the worship of the Hellenized
gods of Asia Minor, and the teachings of the already powerful Christian
Church. With this view they went back to what is probably the earliest
philosophical theory of the origin of the universe, and declared that
before anything was, there existed God, but God conceived as an infinite
ocean of divinity, too great and too remote to be apprehended by man’s
intelligence, of whom and of whose attributes nothing could be known or
said, and who could only be likened to a boundless sea. Something like
this was the view of the earliest inhabitants of Babylonia, who declared
that before heaven or earth or the gods came into being there was
nothing but a vast waste of waters[129]. At some time or another, the
same idea passed into Egypt, when the Egyptians attributed the beginning
of things to Nu or the primaeval deep[130]; and it was probably the
spread of this tradition into Ionia which induced Thales of Miletus, the
earliest of the Ionian philosophers, to assert that water was the first
of all things[131]. This unknowable and inaccessible power, the Ophites
declared to be ineffable or impossible to name, and he was only referred
to by them as Bythos or the Deep. The same idea and the same name were
adopted by most of the later Gnostics[132].
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account