Forerunners and rivals of Christianity : $b being studies in religious history from 330 B.C. to 330 A.D., Vol. 2 (of 2) — John Shaqi
Forerunners and rivals of Christianity : $b being studies in religious history from 330 B.C. to 330 A.D., Vol. 2 (of 2)Legge, Francis
Religion
Forerunners and rivals of Christianity : $b being studies in religious history from 330 B.C. to 330 A.D., Vol. 2 (of 2)
Legge, Francis
Christianity and other religions; Religions
or in other words the soul or animating principle of Nature[149]. It
therefore seems that the first Ophites made their Supreme God a triad
like the Eleusinian, the Alexandrian, and the Anatolian, consisting of
three persons two of whom were males and the third a female, or a
Father, Mother, and Son, of whom the Son was but another and renewed
form of the Father, while the union of all three was necessary to
express every aspect of the Deity, who was nevertheless one in
essence[150]. This threefold division of things, said the Ophites, ran
through all nature “there being three worlds or universes: the angelic
(that sent directly from God), the psychic, and the earthly or material;
and three Churches: the Chosen, the Called, and the Captive[151].” The
meaning of these names we shall see later when we consider the Ophite
idea of the Apocatastasis[152] or return of the worlds to the Deity.
First, however, another Power had to be produced which should serve as
an intermediary or ambassador from the Supreme Triad to the worlds below
it. This necessity may have arisen from Plato’s view, adopted by Philo
of Alexandria, that God was too high and pure to be contaminated by any
contact with matter[153]. But it may also owe something to the idea
common to all Orientals that a king or great man can only communicate
with his inferiors through a _wakil_ or agent; and that this idea was
then current in Phrygia seems plain from the story in the Acts of the
Apostles that in the Lycaonian province Barnabas, who was of majestic
presence, was adored and nearly sacrificed to as Zeus, while Paul, who
was the principal speaker, was only revered as Hermes[154]. The later
Ophite account of the production of this intermediary power or messenger
which we find in Irenaeus is that the Father-and-Son “delighting in the
beauty of the Spirit”—that is of the First Woman—“shed their light upon
her” and thus brought into existence “an incorruptible light, the third
man, whom they call Christos[155].” With this last addition the Divine
Family was considered complete, and the same author tells us that
Christos and his mother were “immediately drawn up into the
incorruptible aeon which they call the veritable Church[156].” This
seems to be the first appearance in Gnosticism of the use of the word
Church as signifying what was later called the Pleroma or Fulness of the
Godhead; but it may be compared to the “Great Council” apparently used
in the same sense by some unidentified prophet quoted by Origen, of
which Great Council Christ was said by the prophet to be the “Angel” or
messenger[157].
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account