Forerunners and rivals of Christianity : $b being studies in religious history from 330 B.C. to 330 A.D., Vol. 2 (of 2)Legge, Francis
Religion
Forerunners and rivals of Christianity : $b being studies in religious history from 330 B.C. to 330 A.D., Vol. 2 (of 2)
Legge, Francis
Christianity and other religions; Religions
Irenaeus also gives the names
of the later “heavens, virtues, powers, angels, and builders” as being
respectively Iao, Sabaoth, Adonai, Eloaeus, Oreus, and Astaphaeus or
Astanpheus, which agrees with the Ophite document or Diagram to be
presently mentioned[166]. The first four of these names are too
evidently the names given in the Old Testament to Yahweh for us to doubt
the assertion of the Fathers that by Ialdabaoth the Ophites meant the
God of the Jews[167]. The last two names, Oreus and Astaphaeus, Origen
also asserts to be taken from the art of magic, and may be supposed to
have some connection with fire and water respectively[168]. It is
probable that the later Ophites identified all these seven heavens with
the seven astrological “planets,” _i.e._ Saturn, Jupiter, Mars, the Sun,
Venus, Mercury and the Moon in probably that order[169].
How now did the earth on which we live come into being? The primitive
Babylonians, whose ideas and culture were at a very early date spread
over the whole of Asia Minor, conceived the earth not as a globe but as
a circular boat like the ancient coracle, over which the heavens
stretched like a canopy or hemisphere[170]. Hence we must regard these
heavens of the planetary powers, Ialdabaoth and his progeny, as a series
of covers fitting one within the other like, in the words of the
Fathers, “juggling cups,” or to take another simile, the successive
skins of an onion. The earth stretched below these, but was at the stage
of creation at which we have arrived really without form and void, being
the formless waste of waters which covered the denser darkness and
chaos. The ordered shape which it afterwards assumed and which we now
see, was, in the Ophite story, the result of the fall of no deity,
angel, or heavenly power, but of Man. Irenaeus’ account of this Second
Fall is that the six powers descended from Ialdabaoth began to quarrel
with their progenitor for supremacy—an idea which perhaps is to be
referred either to the Jewish tradition of the revolt of the angels or
with more likelihood to the astrological ideas about the benefic and
malefic planets[171]. This so enraged him that he glared in his wrath
upon the underlying dregs of matter, and his thought (ἔννοια) implanted
there took birth and shape[172]. This fresh son of his was possessed of
a quality of the possession of which he himself had never given any
evidence, and was called Nous or Intelligence like the male of Simon’s
first syzygy or pair of roots. But he was said to be of serpent form
(ὀφιόμορφος) because, as says the Naassene or Ophite author quoted by
Hippolytus, “the serpent is the personification of the watery element,”
and therefore, perhaps, the symbol of that external ocean which the
ancients thought surrounded the inhabited world[173]. It seems more
probable, however, that the Ophites were compelled to introduce this
form because the serpent was worshipped everywhere in Asia Minor as the
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account